|
Post by captbudman on Jul 15, 2024 8:03:37 GMT -6
Breaking News: Judge Cannon just dismissed documents case against President Trump based on unlawful appointment of Jack Smith. Edit: Here's the link to the Order granting motion to dismiss.
|
|
|
Post by lighthouse on Jul 15, 2024 8:12:08 GMT -6
I'm sure the democrats, along with its allies (MSM, bureaucracies, hollywood, intelligence communities), will respect the decision of the judge
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Jul 15, 2024 8:22:59 GMT -6
Short explanation as to why she dismissed Deranged Jack Smith's indictment. Jack Smith is a private citizen, not an officer of the United States appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Jul 15, 2024 8:25:48 GMT -6
Breaking News: Judge Cannon just dismissed documents case against President Trump based on unlawful appointment of Jack Smith. Edit: Here's the link to the Order granting motion to dismiss. They had to know it was coming! Good on the judge
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Jul 15, 2024 8:33:59 GMT -6
Breaking News: Judge Cannon just dismissed documents case against President Trump based on unlawful appointment of Jack Smith. Edit: Here's the link to the Order granting motion to dismiss. They had to know it was coming! Good on the judge It's interesting that in her order, she wrote "The effect of this Order is confined to this proceeding." That means that the case can only be appealed to the 11th Circuit, not to the leftist DC Court of Appeals (which has been smacked down by the SCOTUS in the Fischer -- Joke 6th Enron law persecution attempt -- and Presidential immunity rulings). Of course, the Biden Regime is going to appeal as part of their "Get Trump" effort.
|
|
|
Post by lighthouse on Jul 15, 2024 10:30:08 GMT -6
Short explanation as to why she dismissed Deranged Jack Smith's indictment. Jack Smith is a private citizen, not an officer of the United States appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. Newt Gingrich was the Speaker of the House when the Independent Counsel Act lapsed, but it had bi-partisan support. This will affect all of Jack Smith's cases, especially the one's he was advising on in New York, and Georgia.
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Jul 15, 2024 10:45:40 GMT -6
Short explanation as to why she dismissed Deranged Jack Smith's indictment. Jack Smith is a private citizen, not an officer of the United States appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. Newt Gingrich was the Speaker of the House when the Independent Counsel Act lapsed, but it had bi-partisan support. This will affect all of Jack Smith's cases, especially the one's he was advising on in New York, and Georgia. The independent counsel statute was largely pushed by the Democrat Majority in Congress. Democrats loved the law when the targets were the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations. Once it was used against Bill Clinton and Democrats, there was bipartisan agreement the law should die. Janet Reno issued the regulation creating the new "independent counsel," but I suspect that when this ruling gets appealed to SCOTUS, Judge Cannon will be confirmed. After Chevron, it's clear that the Court isn't going to allow Bureaucrats usurp Congress's power and write their own laws.
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Jul 15, 2024 11:01:45 GMT -6
They had to know it was coming! Good on the judge It's interesting that in her order, she wrote "The effect of this Order is confined to this proceeding." That means that the case can only be appealed to the 11th Circuit, not to the leftist DC Court of Appeals (which has been smacked down by the SCOTUS in the Fischer -- Joke 6th Enron law persecution attempt -- and Presidential immunity rulings). Of course, the Biden Regime is going to appeal as part of their "Get Trump" effort. She's a smart cookie! Of course, they are going to appeal. One thing the Biden Administration doesn't like is being slapped down in the courts but it's happened so often, they should be used to it! If they don't like it, they need to make sure they are doing everything BY THE LAW and not their emotions
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Jul 15, 2024 11:45:30 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by onemizzou on Jul 15, 2024 12:25:41 GMT -6
Imagine that, the DOJ, our highest office of legal adjudication doesn't know what's Constitutional. Disgraceful. I can't wait to scrub the halls of our legal system of the leftist anti-American scum after Trump takes office.
|
|
|
Post by cardiological on Jul 15, 2024 17:49:28 GMT -6
This is not a case of first impression. Both Democratic and Republican judges have previously reviewed the authority for Special Counsel appointments and affirmed the existing provisions. Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee who has demonstrated an unusual deference toward Trump, has already been slapped down twice in blistering rulings by the conservative-leaning 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. She’ll be going down for the third time for this ridiculous dismissal.
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Jul 15, 2024 18:31:12 GMT -6
This is not a case of first impression. Both Democratic and Republican judges have previously reviewed the authority for Special Counsel appointments and affirmed the existing provisions. Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee who has demonstrated an unusual deference toward Trump, has already been slapped down twice in blistering rulings by the conservative-leaning 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. She’ll be going down for the third time for this ridiculous dismissal. I dont think its that easy. when the doj appeals, you can bet your ass that Justice Thomas' concurring opinion in Trump v US will be the reference. as far as dem and Rep judges reviewing it; how many Judges reviewed Chevron over the last 40 years before it finally got tossed?
|
|
|
Post by stiffy1957 on Jul 15, 2024 18:47:10 GMT -6
It will be overturned. This is Trump corruption by the court he appointed. If you do not see this you are the idiots.
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Jul 15, 2024 19:01:54 GMT -6
It will be overturned. This is Trump corruption by the court he appointed. If you do not see this you are the idiots. You're too stupid to understand the appointments clause
|
|
|
Post by stiffy1957 on Jul 15, 2024 19:03:08 GMT -6
It will be overturned. This is Trump corruption by the court he appointed. If you do not see this you are the idiots. You're too stupid to understand the appointments clause Trump has corrupted this court. No president is supposed to have the court in their back pocket. yet you see nothing wrong here. This is what makes his dictatoship one step closer.
|
|