65
Senior Member
Posts: 557
|
Post by 65 on Jul 30, 2024 7:12:52 GMT -6
I dont. I bet they are shooting for 85 million I know they are doing this because...................exactly why, I'm not sure but they are only kidding themselves. This is a person who had to drop out because she was so unpopular in the 2020 race and then Biden makes the dunderhead move of selecting her as Vice-President, which she fulfilled abysmally, IMO. At least now I understand why Obama and Pelosi, etc. wanted an Open Nomination Process. If I were a Democrat, I'd be worried as well just a thought.... she's a problem for the dem party...a failure and national embarrassment..... so...how do they get rid of her?? run her against trump in an election that any dem is likely to lose.... she loses and is no longer relevant in the party......they are done with her |
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Jul 30, 2024 9:32:15 GMT -6
she has terrible presentation skills.
|
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Jul 30, 2024 11:21:21 GMT -6
I know they are doing this because...................exactly why, I'm not sure but they are only kidding themselves. This is a person who had to drop out because she was so unpopular in the 2020 race and then Biden makes the dunderhead move of selecting her as Vice-President, which she fulfilled abysmally, IMO. At least now I understand why Obama and Pelosi, etc. wanted an Open Nomination Process. If I were a Democrat, I'd be worried as well just a thought.... she's a problem for the dem party...a failure and national embarrassment..... so...how do they get rid of her?? run her against trump in an election that any dem is likely to lose.... she loses and is no longer relevant in the party......they are done with her All Dems right on down the line will suffer with her, just like they would have suffered with Biden! |
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Jul 30, 2024 13:29:45 GMT -6
here she is supporting taxpayer funded gender mutilation for INMATES.
|
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Jul 30, 2024 14:13:59 GMT -6
Fuck that silly Constitution; firearm confiscation!
|
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Jul 30, 2024 20:33:14 GMT -6
Time to break out the fake ass pander accent
|
|
|
|
Post by longtimereader on Jul 31, 2024 7:34:55 GMT -6
Time to break out the fake ass pander accent You mean Kamala is not an inner city or a rural black woman?  |
|
|
|
Post by Starbuck on Jul 31, 2024 8:02:50 GMT -6
She’s the best the Dems have? Remarkable She was forced into the nominee role because the DEMs expect to lose this fall and want to push her off the stage in 2028. She is not smart enough to understand it was a set-up and she was merely a useful idiot - to borrow a phrase. She is being pimped to drive contributions, turnout, and purchased harvested ballots in order to protect DEM seats in urban areas that would be vulnerable with a weak DEM participation rate. While driving away "independents" and persuadable voters that the party believes are already a lost cause this year. That is the play. Meanwhile Whitmer, Newsome, Cooper, and many others are staying as far from the DEM race as possible this year knowing doing so will leave them untarred for 2028. |
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Jul 31, 2024 8:11:40 GMT -6
She’s the best the Dems have? Remarkable She was forced into the nominee role because the DEMs expect to lose this fall and want to push her off the stage in 2028. She is not smart enough to understand it was a set-up and she was merely a useful idiot - to borrow a phrase. She is being pimped to drive contributions, turnout, and purchased harvested ballots in order to protect DEM seats in urban areas that would be vulnerable with a weak DEM participation rate. While driving away "independents" and persuadable voters that the party believes are already a lost cause this year. That is the play. Meanwhile Whitmer, Newsome, Cooper, and many others are staying as far from the DEM race as possible this year knowing doing so will leave them untarred for 2028. She wasn't "forced" into anything. She wanted the nomination (remember, she ran in the 2020 primary but never got one vote). The problem that the Democrat Party had is that they are a race/sex based party, and a woman who is also a "person of color" ranks at or near the top of their hierarchy of political priorities. If she was passed over for a white woman or white male would have caused a civil war in Tammany Hall. The only person who was more "qualified" than Kamala would have been a black, gay/trans woman (as long as he/she/it wasn't Jewish). The other thing to remember is "follow the money." Joe had millions of dollars for his campaign. Kamala could lay claim to it because she was part of the original ticket. They couldn't simply "give" the money to Newsom or Whitmer without a long, legal fight. |
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Jul 31, 2024 12:09:02 GMT -6
Did Kamala prove that she's not "authentically black?"
|
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Jul 31, 2024 12:53:59 GMT -6
Time to break out the fake ass pander accent She's a Hillary wannabee... |
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Jul 31, 2024 15:53:38 GMT -6
Flash back to when she was Indian
|
|
|
|
Post by Starbuck on Jul 31, 2024 18:10:07 GMT -6
She was forced into the nominee role because the DEMs expect to lose this fall and want to push her off the stage in 2028. She is not smart enough to understand it was a set-up and she was merely a useful idiot - to borrow a phrase. She is being pimped to drive contributions, turnout, and purchased harvested ballots in order to protect DEM seats in urban areas that would be vulnerable with a weak DEM participation rate. While driving away "independents" and persuadable voters that the party believes are already a lost cause this year. That is the play. Meanwhile Whitmer, Newsome, Cooper, and many others are staying as far from the DEM race as possible this year knowing doing so will leave them untarred for 2028. She wasn't "forced" into anything. She wanted the nomination (remember, she ran in the 2020 primary but never got one vote). The problem that the Democrat Party had is that they are a race/sex based party, and a woman who is also a "person of color" ranks at or near the top of their hierarchy of political priorities. If she was passed over for a white woman or white male would have caused a civil war in Tammany Hall. The only person who was more "qualified" than Kamala would have been a black, gay/trans woman (as long as he/she/it wasn't Jewish). The other thing to remember is "follow the money." Joe had millions of dollars for his campaign. Kamala could lay claim to it because she was part of the original ticket. They couldn't simply "give" the money to Newsom or Whitmer without a long, legal fight. Yes - she wanted her shot, but the original plan was for her to take over for Joe in May or June of next year thereby propping her up for 2028. Yes - she was forced into it, because when Obama/Pelosi/Schumer conspired to complete a coup against Biden it was with the full knowledge that Kamala would be handed the nomination - and set up to lose. Yes - money was also a part of the calculation - but it is not yet fully determined if she can lay claim to it and there is an active suit pending on that question. |
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Jul 31, 2024 20:37:23 GMT -6
She wasn't "forced" into anything. She wanted the nomination (remember, she ran in the 2020 primary but never got one vote). The problem that the Democrat Party had is that they are a race/sex based party, and a woman who is also a "person of color" ranks at or near the top of their hierarchy of political priorities. If she was passed over for a white woman or white male would have caused a civil war in Tammany Hall. The only person who was more "qualified" than Kamala would have been a black, gay/trans woman (as long as he/she/it wasn't Jewish). The other thing to remember is "follow the money." Joe had millions of dollars for his campaign. Kamala could lay claim to it because she was part of the original ticket. They couldn't simply "give" the money to Newsom or Whitmer without a long, legal fight. Yes - she wanted her shot, but the original plan was for her to take over for Joe in May or June of next year thereby propping her up for 2028. Do you have anything that you can link to show that "the plan" was for Joe to resign 6 months into his new administration so that Kamala can take over? IIRC, what I've read is that Joe and Jill wanted Sen. Klobuchar to be the nominee, not Kamala, when the Democrat Party ruling class coup happened. Yes - she was forced into it, because when Obama/Pelosi/Schumer conspired to complete a coup against Biden it was with the full knowledge that Kamala would be handed the nomination - and set up to lose. What politician that ran for President, but never got a vote, would be "forced" to take a job she actively sought -- but was publicly rejected for -- the first time she tried for it? I can't wait for you to provide support for your assumption (and not falling back to your "I'm an unbiased person" explanation)... Yes - money was also a part of the calculation - but it is not yet fully determined if she can lay claim to it and there is an active suit pending on that question. There may be litigation, but the majority of legal opinions are Kamala will be able to spend the money. Klobuchar and others could never have touched Joe's war chest... |
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Aug 1, 2024 10:15:15 GMT -6
President Trump is a brilliant communicator...   |
|
