|
|
Post by captbudman on Aug 26, 2024 9:49:16 GMT -6
And the same RFK Jr who quit law school to campaign for Uncle Teddie
"RFK Jr. had dropped out of law school in order to campaign for his uncle."
RFKJ is a nut job. That's why MAGA embraces him despite his extreme left views on most substantive issues. RFK has already stated that he's not going to agree with Trump on everything. RFK, like Bernie and Tulsi, is a leftist that also has populist beliefs. What he shares with Republicans is questioning the NeoCons that control the DNC and their dying RINO partners in their zest for endless foreign wars, objecting to the regulatory capture of the FDA/CDC by Big Ag/Big Pharma, and working for the health of Children. Have you ever wondered why we have an increase in the number of children with autism, ADHD, and other issues? Why are so many kids being medicated at such a young age (it wasn't common when you were in elementary school)? Why are we now injecting kids with 11 vaccinations in the first 15 months, which is double what it was in the 1990s and quadruple the number of the 1990s?  |
|
|
|
Post by lighthouse on Aug 26, 2024 9:53:44 GMT -6
And when that alleged Democrat's family tells you he's nuts and has the support of NO ONE in his Democratic family, and they warn you about the danger of voting for this alleged Democrat, you should probably listen to the dead worm in his brain. that alleged Democrat's family spoke of the successful Biden administration, was their reason for supporting Biden. Who are they supporting now? |
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 301
|
Post by Nano on Aug 26, 2024 9:57:52 GMT -6
RFKJ is a nut job. That's why MAGA embraces him despite his extreme left views on most substantive issues. RFK has already stated that he's not going to agree with Trump on everything. RFK, like Bernie and Tulsi, is a leftist that also has populist beliefs. What he shares with Republicans is questioning the NeoCons that control the DNC and their dying RINO partners in their zest for endless foreign wars, objecting to the regulatory capture of the FDA/CDC by Big Ag/Big Pharma, and working for the health of Children. Have you ever wondered why we have an increase in the number of children with autism, ADHD, and other issues? Why are so many kids being medicated at such a young age (it wasn't common when you were in elementary school)? Why are we now injecting kids with 11 vaccinations in the first 15 months, which is double what it was in the 1990s and quadruple the number of the 1990s? You hit on it. It's populism. You guys don't actually believe in anything except what feels good now. When has that ever not gone bad? |
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 301
|
Post by Nano on Aug 26, 2024 10:03:40 GMT -6
And the same RFK Jr who quit law school to campaign for Uncle Teddie
"RFK Jr. had dropped out of law school in order to campaign for his uncle."
You are trying to debate with people who have no principles. That's not easy. |
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Aug 26, 2024 10:12:04 GMT -6
RFK has already stated that he's not going to agree with Trump on everything. RFK, like Bernie and Tulsi, is a leftist that also has populist beliefs. What he shares with Republicans is questioning the NeoCons that control the DNC and their dying RINO partners in their zest for endless foreign wars, objecting to the regulatory capture of the FDA/CDC by Big Ag/Big Pharma, and working for the health of Children. Have you ever wondered why we have an increase in the number of children with autism, ADHD, and other issues? Why are so many kids being medicated at such a young age (it wasn't common when you were in elementary school)? Why are we now injecting kids with 11 vaccinations in the first 15 months, which is double what it was in the 1990s and quadruple the number of the 1990s? You hit on it. It's populism. You guys don't actually believe in anything except what feels good now. When has that ever not gone bad? Being a populist doesn't mean not embracing the Constitution. The problem with the Republican Party is that it was hijacked under the era of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Darth Vader's daughter Dick Cheney in Drag, St. John McCain, the MSM Saint's BFF Lindsey Grahamnesty, Mittens Romney, and NeoCon Nikki's globalist, open border, warmongering era. The Party is now returning to the era of Reagan, who kept us out of foreign wars, created the path to defeat communism, and supported US jobs via tariffs and import quotas (leading companies like Toyota and Honda to manufacture in America). Hell, even under President Dick Cheney's regime, George W. Bush never even asked his father's advise if it was wise to invade invade Iraq, especially since he recognized that his military force that liberated Kuwait wasn't sufficient to invade and peacefully occupy it? "Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream, engaging in mission creep, and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible. We had been unable to find Noriega in Panama, which we knew intimately. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Under those circumstances, there was no viable "exit strategy" we could see, violating another of our principles. Furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-Cold War world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations' mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically different--and perhaps barren--outcome." -- George H.W. Bush and Brent Scowcroft, A World Transformed (1998), pp. 489-90 |
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 301
|
Post by Nano on Aug 26, 2024 10:20:51 GMT -6
You hit on it. It's populism. You guys don't actually believe in anything except what feels good now. When has that ever not gone bad? Being a populist doesn't mean not embracing the Constitution. The problem with the Republican Party is that it was hijacked under the era of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Darth Vader's daughter Dick Cheney in Drag, St. John McCain, the MSM Saint's BFF Lindsey Grahamnesty, Mittens Romney, and NeoCon Nikki's globalist, open border, warmongering era. The Party is now returning to the era of Reagan, who kept us out of foreign wars, created the path to defeat communism, and supported US jobs via tariffs and import quotas (leading companies like Toyota and Honda to manufacture in America). Hell, even under President Dick Cheney's regime, George W. Bush never even asked his father's advise if it was wise to invade invade Iraq, especially since he recognized that his military force that liberated Kuwait wasn't sufficient to invade and peacefully occupy it? "Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream, engaging in mission creep, and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible. We had been unable to find Noriega in Panama, which we knew intimately. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Under those circumstances, there was no viable "exit strategy" we could see, violating another of our principles. Furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-Cold War world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations' mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically different--and perhaps barren--outcome." -- George H.W. Bush and Brent Scowcroft, A World Transformed (1998), pp. 489-90 Of course it does. Free speech is a great example. MAGA loves free speech until they don't agree with it. Populism is bad. We put controls in place to defeat populism. The general population is retarded and self interested. Populism is Putin, Kim, Hitler, Castro, Mussolini, Chavez, etc. That is NOT what we are. If you don't like it, move to Cuba and leave the rest of us alone. |
|
|
|
Post by moody on Aug 26, 2024 10:45:41 GMT -6
Being a populist doesn't mean not embracing the Constitution. The problem with the Republican Party is that it was hijacked under the era of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Darth Vader's daughter Dick Cheney in Drag, St. John McCain, the MSM Saint's BFF Lindsey Grahamnesty, Mittens Romney, and NeoCon Nikki's globalist, open border, warmongering era. The Party is now returning to the era of Reagan, who kept us out of foreign wars, created the path to defeat communism, and supported US jobs via tariffs and import quotas (leading companies like Toyota and Honda to manufacture in America). Hell, even under President Dick Cheney's regime, George W. Bush never even asked his father's advise if it was wise to invade invade Iraq, especially since he recognized that his military force that liberated Kuwait wasn't sufficient to invade and peacefully occupy it? "Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream, engaging in mission creep, and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible. We had been unable to find Noriega in Panama, which we knew intimately. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Under those circumstances, there was no viable "exit strategy" we could see, violating another of our principles. Furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-Cold War world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations' mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically different--and perhaps barren--outcome." -- George H.W. Bush and Brent Scowcroft, A World Transformed (1998), pp. 489-90 Of course it does. Free speech is a great example. MAGA loves free speech until they don't agree with it. Populism is bad. We put controls in place to defeat populism. The general population is retarded and self interested. Populism is Putin, Kim, Hitler, Castro, Mussolini, Chavez, etc. That is NOT what we are. If you don't like it, move to Cuba and leave the rest of us alone. Move to Cubs? You are a cartoonish sort of fool. |
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 301
|
Post by Nano on Aug 26, 2024 10:48:35 GMT -6
Of course it does. Free speech is a great example. MAGA loves free speech until they don't agree with it. Populism is bad. We put controls in place to defeat populism. The general population is retarded and self interested. Populism is Putin, Kim, Hitler, Castro, Mussolini, Chavez, etc. That is NOT what we are. If you don't like it, move to Cuba and leave the rest of us alone. Move to Cubs? You are a cartoonish sort of fool. Uh what? |
|
|
|
Post by moody on Aug 26, 2024 11:23:25 GMT -6
Move to Cubs? You are a cartoonish sort of fool. Uh what? Cuba. Cuba. |
|
|
|
Post by arrass on Aug 26, 2024 11:29:49 GMT -6
Being a populist doesn't mean not embracing the Constitution. The problem with the Republican Party is that it was hijacked under the era of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Darth Vader's daughter Dick Cheney in Drag, St. John McCain, the MSM Saint's BFF Lindsey Grahamnesty, Mittens Romney, and NeoCon Nikki's globalist, open border, warmongering era. The Party is now returning to the era of Reagan, who kept us out of foreign wars, created the path to defeat communism, and supported US jobs via tariffs and import quotas (leading companies like Toyota and Honda to manufacture in America). Hell, even under President Dick Cheney's regime, George W. Bush never even asked his father's advise if it was wise to invade invade Iraq, especially since he recognized that his military force that liberated Kuwait wasn't sufficient to invade and peacefully occupy it? "Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream, engaging in mission creep, and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible. We had been unable to find Noriega in Panama, which we knew intimately. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Under those circumstances, there was no viable "exit strategy" we could see, violating another of our principles. Furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-Cold War world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations' mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically different--and perhaps barren--outcome." -- George H.W. Bush and Brent Scowcroft, A World Transformed (1998), pp. 489-90 Of course it does. Free speech is a great example. MAGA loves free speech until they don't agree with it. Populism is bad. We put controls in place to defeat populism. The general population is retarded and self interested. Populism is Putin, Kim, Hitler, Castro, Mussolini, Chavez, etc. That is NOT what we are. If you don't like it, move to Cuba and leave the rest of us alone. Where has populism ever worked? |
|
|
|
Post by longtimereader on Aug 26, 2024 11:35:20 GMT -6
What you folks want back the "true" Republicans that brought you:
1) NAFTA that started the gutting of American manufacturing
2) Patriot Act
3) 20+ years of wars
4) Globalism
5) Have never rolled back a damn thing that the left has gotten passed.
What is there to like in that?
The current populism is direct response to the uniparty BS that has been doing on for decades, screwing over average Americans.
|
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 301
|
Post by Nano on Aug 26, 2024 11:40:50 GMT -6
Of course it does. Free speech is a great example. MAGA loves free speech until they don't agree with it. Populism is bad. We put controls in place to defeat populism. The general population is retarded and self interested. Populism is Putin, Kim, Hitler, Castro, Mussolini, Chavez, etc. That is NOT what we are. If you don't like it, move to Cuba and leave the rest of us alone. Where has populism ever worked? Literally nowhere. Thats why they cant cite an example. It typically winds up in war or oppression. It is by definition mob rule. |
|
|
|
Post by longtimereader on Aug 26, 2024 11:42:16 GMT -6
Where has populism ever worked? It is by definition mob rule. No, no it's not. What's funny about your claim about war or oppression the system you support has created both of those. |
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 301
|
Post by Nano on Aug 26, 2024 11:59:10 GMT -6
It is by definition mob rule. No, no it's not. What's funny about your claim about war or oppression the system you support has created both of those. You fucking jackoffs are pining for civil war every day. Every day. You're all fucking nuts most likely because you are a bunch of losers who cannot compete in today's society. Name one populist regime, just one, that has enjoyed prolonged success. Yeah, that's what I thought. I am sorry your daddy touched you like that. But there is counseling for it. Seek help. |
|
|
|
Post by longtimereader on Aug 26, 2024 12:01:29 GMT -6
No, no it's not. What's funny about your claim about war or oppression the system you support has created both of those. You fucking jackoffs are pining for civil war every day. Every day. You're all fucking nuts most likely because you are a bunch of losers who cannot compete in today's society. Name one populist regime, just one, that has enjoyed prolonged success. Yeah, that's what I thought. I am sorry your daddy touched you like that. But there is counseling for it. Seek help. Oh look at you all triggered. I'm not interested in civil war I compete just fine but I'm really really really tired of you useless boomers that want to suck society dry because you're a bunch of selfish pricks. populism has worked look up sewer socialism in Milwaukee, which resulted in a government that actually worked for the people unlike you "true" POS Republicans that are just as much scum as your leftist butt buddies. You "true" republicans are always the bottom to the leftist you love so much. |
|
