|
Post by cardiological on Sept 18, 2024 0:50:27 GMT -6
Trump has called Harris a Marxist, a Communist and a Fascist. www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/sep/04/donald-trump/fact-check-trump-called-kamala-harris-a-communist/…implying she is one of the evil, sick “thugs” looking to “destroy our once great USA” and should “rot in hell” “ Included also are World Leaders, both good and bad, but none of which are as evil and ‘sick’ as the THUGS we have inside our Country who, with their Open Borders, INFLATION, Afghanistan Surrender, Green New Scam, High Taxes, No Energy Independence, Woke Military, Russia/Ukraine, Israel/Iran, All Electric Car Lunacy, and so much more, are looking to destroy our once great USA. MAY THEY ROT IN HELL. AGAIN, MERRY CHRISTMAS!” the former president concluded.”thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4376797-trump-may-they-rot-in-hell-merry-christmas/In his Jan 6 incendiary diatribe, Trump insisted that “we do not want to see our election victory stolen by radical left Democrats”…”we are not going to let that happen”…they had gathered “to save democracy”…otherwise Biden will be president “and our country will be destroyed”…”if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore”. www.npr.org/2021/02/10/966396848/read-trumps-jan-6-speech-a-key-part-of-impeachment-trialNothing - NOTHING! - justifies the recent attempts on Trump’s life, and thank God he is safe. But blaming Democratic rhetoric, which doesn’t even approach Trump’s sustained and unprecedented verbal and written attacks over the past decade, is absurd.You can’t watch the montage and believe that Trump’s “verbal” attacks are worse than those from the other side. Maybe there is something out there, but I can’t recall him ever saying an opponent should be killed. Maybe you can’t recall Trump saying an opponent should be killed, but Bill Barr can, at least in private. And Trump publicly mused about General Milley being executed. On the other hand, can you identify a single instance where Harris or Walz has called for the death of Trump? Sure, Beck can play videos of some idiot leftist kooks doing so, just as I can show you exterminationist threats from right wingers, or J6 “patriots” parading a noose and chanting “hang Mike Pence”. A montage of various politicians and political commentators claiming Trump is a threat to democracy is both understandable and justified in light of his actions leading up to Jan 6, including fomenting the storming of the Capitol, a mass assault on our seat of government which Mitch McConnell (correctly) labeled an insurrection. (Beck should have included statements from various Republicans who worked for Trump during his presidency.) There was one problematic term in Beck’s video uttered by a Democratic politician, and it was quickly addressed. Of course the partisan Beck failed to mention it: Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.) apologized Monday for his “poor choice of words” when he said former President Trump must be “eliminated” to protect democracy.
“Yesterday on TV, I mistakenly used the wrong word to express the importance for America that Donald Trump doesn’t become President again,” Goldman wrote on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.
“While he must be defeated, I certainly wish no harm to him and do not condone political violence,” Goldman continued. “I apologize for the poor choice of words.” thehill.com/homenews/house/4321089-trump-goldman-apology-eliminated-democracy-2024/Can you imagine Trump ever issuing an apology? I can’t. By the way, of the four major party President and V-P candidates - Trump, Vance, Harris and Walz - the one who has come the closest to calling Trump “Hitler” on a past occasion is JD Vance. Maybe we should hold him responsible for the assassination attempts.
|
|
|
Post by gotmewrong on Sept 18, 2024 4:03:24 GMT -6
Shut the fuck up, asshole. Congratulations, simpleton. You’re outdone your brain stem sidekick in posting middle school drivel. "You're outdone"? Fuck you.
|
|
|
Post by gotmewrong on Sept 18, 2024 4:04:51 GMT -6
You can’t watch the montage and believe that Trump’s “verbal” attacks are worse than those from the other side. Maybe there is something out there, but I can’t recall him ever saying an opponent should be killed. Maybe you can’t recall Trump saying an opponent should be killed, but Bill Barr can, at least in private. And Trump publicly mused about General Milley being executed. On the other hand, can you identify a single instance where Harris or Walz has called for the death of Trump? Sure, Beck can play videos of some idiot leftist kooks doing so, just as I can show you exterminationist threats from right wingers, or J6 “patriots” parading a noose and chanting “hang Mike Pence”. A montage of various politicians and political commentators claiming Trump is a threat to democracy is both understandable and justified in light of his actions leading up to Jan 6, including fomenting the storming of the Capitol, a mass assault on our seat of government which Mitch McConnell (correctly) labeled an insurrection. (Beck should have included statements from various Republicans who worked for Trump during his presidency.) There was one problematic term in Beck’s video uttered by a Democratic politician, and it was quickly addressed. Of course the partisan Beck failed to mention it: Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.) apologized Monday for his “poor choice of words” when he said former President Trump must be “eliminated” to protect democracy.
“Yesterday on TV, I mistakenly used the wrong word to express the importance for America that Donald Trump doesn’t become President again,” Goldman wrote on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.
“While he must be defeated, I certainly wish no harm to him and do not condone political violence,” Goldman continued. “I apologize for the poor choice of words.” thehill.com/homenews/house/4321089-trump-goldman-apology-eliminated-democracy-2024/Can you imagine Trump ever issuing an apology? I can’t. By the way, of the four major party President and V-P candidates - Trump, Vance, Harris and Walz - the one who has come the closest to calling Trump “Hitler” on a past occasion is JD Vance. Maybe we should hold him responsible for the assassination attempts. Can you assholes ever take responsibility for anything? GFY.
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Sept 18, 2024 6:35:03 GMT -6
Maybe you can’t recall Trump saying an opponent should be killed, but Bill Barr can, at least in private. And Trump publicly mused about General Milley being executed. On the other hand, can you identify a single instance where Harris or Walz has called for the death of Trump? Sure, Beck can play videos of some idiot leftist kooks doing so, just as I can show you exterminationist threats from right wingers, or J6 “patriots” parading a noose and chanting “hang Mike Pence”. A montage of various politicians and political commentators claiming Trump is a threat to democracy is both understandable and justified in light of his actions leading up to Jan 6, including fomenting the storming of the Capitol, a mass assault on our seat of government which Mitch McConnell (correctly) labeled an insurrection. (Beck should have included statements from various Republicans who worked for Trump during his presidency.) There was one problematic term in Beck’s video uttered by a Democratic politician, and it was quickly addressed. Of course the partisan Beck failed to mention it: Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.) apologized Monday for his “poor choice of words” when he said former President Trump must be “eliminated” to protect democracy.
“Yesterday on TV, I mistakenly used the wrong word to express the importance for America that Donald Trump doesn’t become President again,” Goldman wrote on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.
“While he must be defeated, I certainly wish no harm to him and do not condone political violence,” Goldman continued. “I apologize for the poor choice of words.” thehill.com/homenews/house/4321089-trump-goldman-apology-eliminated-democracy-2024/Can you imagine Trump ever issuing an apology? I can’t. By the way, of the four major party President and V-P candidates - Trump, Vance, Harris and Walz - the one who has come the closest to calling Trump “Hitler” on a past occasion is JD Vance. Maybe we should hold him responsible for the assassination attempts. Can you assholes ever take responsibility for anything? GFY. That was a rhetorical question, wasn't it? Just a few..... thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4883298-kamala-harris-donald-trump-georgia-abortion-law/www.cnn.com/2024/01/22/politics/kamala-harris-cnntv/index.html
|
|
|
Post by moody on Sept 18, 2024 6:43:58 GMT -6
Its always Trump’s fault with these low-IQ, mind-control subjects.
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Sept 18, 2024 6:53:59 GMT -6
Its always Trump’s fault with these low-IQ, mind-control subjects. Yep....ROFLMAO!
|
|
|
Post by cardiological on Sept 18, 2024 7:31:27 GMT -6
Maybe you can’t recall Trump saying an opponent should be killed, but Bill Barr can, at least in private. And Trump publicly mused about General Milley being executed. On the other hand, can you identify a single instance where Harris or Walz has called for the death of Trump? Sure, Beck can play videos of some idiot leftist kooks doing so, just as I can show you exterminationist threats from right wingers, or J6 “patriots” parading a noose and chanting “hang Mike Pence”. A montage of various politicians and political commentators claiming Trump is a threat to democracy is both understandable and justified in light of his actions leading up to Jan 6, including fomenting the storming of the Capitol, a mass assault on our seat of government which Mitch McConnell (correctly) labeled an insurrection. (Beck should have included statements from various Republicans who worked for Trump during his presidency.) There was one problematic term in Beck’s video uttered by a Democratic politician, and it was quickly addressed. Of course the partisan Beck failed to mention it: Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.) apologized Monday for his “poor choice of words” when he said former President Trump must be “eliminated” to protect democracy.
“Yesterday on TV, I mistakenly used the wrong word to express the importance for America that Donald Trump doesn’t become President again,” Goldman wrote on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.
“While he must be defeated, I certainly wish no harm to him and do not condone political violence,” Goldman continued. “I apologize for the poor choice of words.” thehill.com/homenews/house/4321089-trump-goldman-apology-eliminated-democracy-2024/Can you imagine Trump ever issuing an apology? I can’t. By the way, of the four major party President and V-P candidates - Trump, Vance, Harris and Walz - the one who has come the closest to calling Trump “Hitler” on a past occasion is JD Vance. Maybe we should hold him responsible for the assassination attempts. Can you assholes ever take responsibility for anything? GFY. Can you make a cogent argument? Apparently not. You have failed miserably so far. Juvenile, profanity-laden insults don’t count.
|
|
|
Post by gotmewrong on Sept 18, 2024 7:44:54 GMT -6
Can you assholes ever take responsibility for anything? GFY. Can you make a cogent argument? Apparently not. You have failed miserably so far. Juvenile, profanity-laden insults don’t count. I'm done trying to reason with you assholes. GFY.
|
|
|
Post by cardiological on Sept 18, 2024 8:28:56 GMT -6
Its always Trump’s fault with these low-IQ, mind-control subjects. Well, moody, you’re clearly an appropriate spokesman for low IQ dupes. I’ll give you that. My argument is simply this: There has never been a President or presidential candidate in U.S. history who has dispensed the sheer volume of inflammatory rhetoric as has Donald Trump. There have been some rough and tumble, bare knuckle campaigns and campaigners - Jefferson/Adams, Jackson/Adams, Cleveland/Blaine, Give-‘em-hell Harry Truman, even Teddy Roosevelt - but over the past decade Trump is in a class by himself. However, feel free to submit your own nominee. .
|
|
|
Post by moody on Sept 18, 2024 8:57:18 GMT -6
Its always Trump’s fault with these low-IQ, mind-control subjects. Well, moody, you’re clearly an appropriate spokesman for low IQ dupes. I’ll give you that. My argument is simply this: There has never been a President or presidential candidate in U.S. history who has dispensed the sheer volume of inflammatory rhetoric as has Donald Trump. There have been some rough and tumble, bare knuckle campaigns and campaigners - Jefferson/Adams, Jackson/Adams, Cleveland/Blaine, Give-‘em-hell Harry Truman, even Teddy Roosevelt - but over the past decade Trump is in a class by himself. However, feel free to submit your own nominee. . There goes your TDS again. Trump, Trump, Trump! The rest of us are taking about free speech, the first amendment. I give your side the right to lie to my face, and call what is truth, disinformation. This free speech is protected in the first amendment. However, I choose to ignore the bullshit that you progressives espouse. I want to focus on our constitutional rights. Nothing is more sacred than the first amendment. Your side is not the arbiter of truth. In fact, it’s nearly the opposite.
|
|
|
Post by gotmewrong on Sept 18, 2024 9:01:24 GMT -6
Its always Trump’s fault with these low-IQ, mind-control subjects. Well, moody, you’re clearly an appropriate spokesman for low IQ dupes. I’ll give you that. My argument is simply this: There has never been a President or presidential candidate in U.S. history who has dispensed the sheer volume of inflammatory rhetoric as has Donald Trump. There have been some rough and tumble, bare knuckle campaigns and campaigners - Jefferson/Adams, Jackson/Adams, Cleveland/Blaine, Give-‘em-hell Harry Truman, even Teddy Roosevelt - but over the past decade Trump is in a class by himself. However, feel free to submit your own nominee. . And here you are calling people who disagree with you "low-IQ dupes". But you people never use inflammatory rhetoric. GFY.
|
|
|
Post by cardiological on Sept 18, 2024 10:38:32 GMT -6
Well, moody, you’re clearly an appropriate spokesman for low IQ dupes. I’ll give you that. My argument is simply this: There has never been a President or presidential candidate in U.S. history who has dispensed the sheer volume of inflammatory rhetoric as has Donald Trump. There have been some rough and tumble, bare knuckle campaigns and campaigners - Jefferson/Adams, Jackson/Adams, Cleveland/Blaine, Give-‘em-hell Harry Truman, even Teddy Roosevelt - but over the past decade Trump is in a class by himself. However, feel free to submit your own nominee. . There goes your TDS again. Trump, Trump, Trump! The rest of us are taking about free speech, the first amendment. I give your side the right to lie to my face, and call what is truth, disinformation. This free speech is protected in the first amendment. However, I choose to ignore the bullshit that you progressives espouse. I want to focus on our constitutional rights. Nothing is more sacred than the first amendment. Your side is not the arbiter of truth. In fact, it’s nearly the opposite. Moody, how many times do I need to criticize, in fact vehemently attack, the progressive wing of the Democratic party before it sinks in that I am NOT a progressive. It would be like my insisting that you are a neocon in the face of obvious evidence to the contrary. Two of the very few threads I have started either here or at the predecessor forum have been demonstrably anti-progressive. My most detailed posts favorably quoting political pundits have likewise been anti-progressive. One of my major criticisms of Biden has been that he, an ostensible centrist, is too deferential to the far left progressive wing of the party. I am an avid defender of free speech and have deplored the fascist strain and cancel culture more recently prevalent in leftist ideology that shuts it down and ends careers, especially on college campuses. It’s actually illiberal, not liberalism. Harris still has a ways to go to convince me her pivot to the center, and centrist governance, is sincere and authentic. Thus my present intention, as I’ve frequently mentioned, remains a write in vote this November. So, please, just stifle the “you progressives” horseshit. But it doesn’t affect my belief that while incendiary rhetoric from either side is toxic and unhealthy, Trump is the worst offender.
|
|
|
Post by moody on Sept 18, 2024 10:43:41 GMT -6
There goes your TDS again. Trump, Trump, Trump! The rest of us are taking about free speech, the first amendment. I give your side the right to lie to my face, and call what is truth, disinformation. This free speech is protected in the first amendment. However, I choose to ignore the bullshit that you progressives espouse. I want to focus on our constitutional rights. Nothing is more sacred than the first amendment. Your side is not the arbiter of truth. In fact, it’s nearly the opposite. Moody, how many times do I need to criticize, in fact vehemently attack, the progressive wing of the Democratic party before it sinks in that I am NOT a progressive. It would be like my insisting that you are a neocon in the face of obvious evidence to the contrary. Two of the very few threads I have started either here or at the predecessor forum have been demonstrably anti-progressive. My most detailed posts favorably quoting political pundits have likewise been anti-progressive. One of my major criticisms of Biden has been that he, an ostensible centrist, is too deferential to the far left progressive wing of the party. I am an avid defender of free speech and have deplored the fascist strain and cancel culture more recently prevalent in leftist ideology that shuts it down and ends careers, especially on college campuses. It’s actually illiberal, not liberalism. Harris still has a ways to go to convince me her pivot to the center, and centrist governance, is sincere and authentic. Thus my present intention, as I’ve frequently mentioned, remains a write in vote this November. So, please, just stifle the “you progressives” horseshit. But it doesn’t affect my belief that while incendiary rhetoric from either side is toxic and unhealthy, Trump is the worst offender. Yeah, whatever. “You are not a progressive” who supports the two most far-left, radical, socialist Presidential candidates ever. Yeah, you will say, I am an independent, bullshit. Your actions speak MUCH LOUDER than the bullshit that you pretend is true. Nothing else you wrote deserves a response after your ridiculous initial point. You either support our constitutional freedoms, or you don’t. It’s that simple. Yet, like always, any discussion about our rights sends you into another TDS-moment. It’s predictable and annoying. Strangely enough, you think that you are on point. 🙄
|
|
|
Post by cardiological on Sept 19, 2024 12:31:42 GMT -6
Moody, how many times do I need to criticize, in fact vehemently attack, the progressive wing of the Democratic party before it sinks in that I am NOT a progressive. It would be like my insisting that you are a neocon in the face of obvious evidence to the contrary. Two of the very few threads I have started either here or at the predecessor forum have been demonstrably anti-progressive. My most detailed posts favorably quoting political pundits have likewise been anti-progressive. One of my major criticisms of Biden has been that he, an ostensible centrist, is too deferential to the far left progressive wing of the party. I am an avid defender of free speech and have deplored the fascist strain and cancel culture more recently prevalent in leftist ideology that shuts it down and ends careers, especially on college campuses. It’s actually illiberal, not liberalism. Harris still has a ways to go to convince me her pivot to the center, and centrist governance, is sincere and authentic. Thus my present intention, as I’ve frequently mentioned, remains a write in vote this November. So, please, just stifle the “you progressives” horseshit. But it doesn’t affect my belief that while incendiary rhetoric from either side is toxic and unhealthy, Trump is the worst offender. Yeah, whatever. “You are not a progressive” who supports the two most far-left, radical, socialist Presidential candidates ever. Yeah, you will say, I am an independent, bullshit. Your actions speak MUCH LOUDER than the bullshit that you pretend is true. Nothing else you wrote deserves a response after your ridiculous initial point. You either support our constitutional freedoms, or you don’t. It’s that simple. Yet, like always, any discussion about our rights sends you into another TDS-moment. It’s predictable and annoying. Strangely enough, you think that you are on point. 🙄 For heaven’s sake, moody. You’re not only not bright enough to sustain a coherent argument, but you are also fundamentally dishonest. I’ve never claimed to be an Independent, having frequently noted that I’m a centrist Democrat with serious concerns about the left progressive record of Harris (eviscerated in a lengthy essay by Andrew Sullivan, excerpts of which I posted here because it reflected my own skepticism of her ideology.) it also underpins my frequently repeated intention to write in a presidential choice in November or limit my voting to down ballot. Just because you are slavishly devoted to Trump doesn’t mean others aren’t capable of objective analysis and making decisions accordingly. Criticism of Trump is not TDS, nor does it translate to unwavering support for Harris. I can’t help your lack of comprehension and perception, and evidently you can’t help it either. But at least demonstrate a modicum of integrity and stop misrepresenting my political posture.
|
|
|
Post by moody on Sept 19, 2024 14:11:52 GMT -6
Yeah, whatever. “You are not a progressive” who supports the two most far-left, radical, socialist Presidential candidates ever. Yeah, you will say, I am an independent, bullshit. Your actions speak MUCH LOUDER than the bullshit that you pretend is true. Nothing else you wrote deserves a response after your ridiculous initial point. You either support our constitutional freedoms, or you don’t. It’s that simple. Yet, like always, any discussion about our rights sends you into another TDS-moment. It’s predictable and annoying. Strangely enough, you think that you are on point. 🙄 For heaven’s sake, moody. You’re not only not bright enough to sustain a coherent argument, but you are also fundamentally dishonest. I’ve never claimed to be an Independent, having frequently noted that I’m a centrist Democrat with serious concerns about the left progressive record of Harris (eviscerated in a lengthy essay by Andrew Sullivan, excerpts of which I posted here because it reflected my own skepticism of her ideology.) it also underpins my frequently repeated intention to write in a presidential choice in November or limit my voting to down ballot. Just because you are slavishly devoted to Trump doesn’t mean others aren’t capable of objective analysis and making decisions accordingly. Criticism of Trump is not TDS, nor does it translate to unwavering support for Harris. I can’t help your lack of comprehension and perception, and evidently you can’t help it either. But at least demonstrate a modicum of integrity and stop misrepresenting my political posture. Yeah, it’s actually chronic TDS when we start a post with an anti-1st amendment slam by Hillary, and you, as always jump right to Trump. What about that first amendment? Trump! The fact that you are completely unaware of your illness is the oddest thing.
|
|