|
Post by str8shooter on Oct 28, 2024 17:29:27 GMT -6
She said that Trump has said that he is going to terminate the U.S. Constitution. Can you believe the length of lying that this b... goes to in order to try to get votes? That kind of political rhetoric is dangerous.
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Oct 28, 2024 17:59:19 GMT -6
She said that Trump has said that he is going to terminate the U.S. Constitution. Can you believe the length of lying that this b... goes to in order to try to get votes? That kind of political rhetoric is dangerous. Who is dumber; her for saying it or the millions of brain dead dnc commie zombies who will believe it
|
|
|
Post by Aesa on Oct 28, 2024 18:03:37 GMT -6
She said that Trump has said that he is going to terminate the U.S. Constitution. Can you believe the length of lying that this b... goes to in order to try to get votes? That kind of political rhetoric is dangerous. Who is dumber; her for saying it or the millions of brain dead dnc commie zombies who will believe it 50/50
|
|
|
Post by floridaanticub on Oct 28, 2024 18:23:55 GMT -6
Now just fabricating new stuff out of thin air. Something new every day. Not something you do when your handlers think you are winning.
|
|
65
Senior Member
Posts: 557
|
Post by 65 on Oct 28, 2024 18:52:00 GMT -6
Democrats are scumbag liars, so this is to be expected..
I am more troubled that we are living with people that believe it..
|
|
|
Post by longtimereader on Oct 28, 2024 19:13:47 GMT -6
3Swallows will be along in a while and explain how what she said is no what she said and eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee TRUMP!!!!! the dictator!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by keefdaman on Oct 28, 2024 19:21:15 GMT -6
She said that Trump has said that he is going to terminate the U.S. Constitution. Can you believe the length of lying that this b... goes to in order to try to get votes? That kind of political rhetoric is dangerous. she is desperate
|
|
|
Post by keefdaman on Oct 28, 2024 19:44:52 GMT -6
She said that Trump has said that he is going to terminate the U.S. Constitution. Can you believe the length of lying that this b... goes to in order to try to get votes? That kind of political rhetoric is dangerous. Probably why people like Bezos are going to change the newsprint industry.
|
|
|
Post by Starbuck on Oct 28, 2024 20:07:18 GMT -6
She said that Trump has said that he is going to terminate the U.S. Constitution. Can you believe the length of lying that this b... goes to in order to try to get votes? That kind of political rhetoric is dangerous. You are correct. This is nothing more than Harris fueling the rabid left base. She needs massive turnout from that group after unsuccessfully pimping herself as a moderate in the failing play for independents.
|
|
|
Post by cardiological on Oct 28, 2024 20:20:08 GMT -6
Now just fabricating new stuff out of thin air. Something new every day. Not something you do when your handlers think you are winning. No, it was not fabricated out of thin air. Harris embellished Trump’s monumentally stupid Truth Social post of Dec. 2022, a post so moronic even Ted Cruz condemned it. Did Harris stretch Trump’s intent? Probably. And every politician in the universe would have exploited Trump’s jaw-dropping ignorance. Here is the key language: “…A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Trump wrote on Truth Social on December 3, 2022. "Our great 'Founder' did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!"archive.ph/2022.12.04-234611/https://truthsocial.com/@realdonaldtrump/posts/109449803240069864
|
|
|
Post by str8shooter on Oct 29, 2024 7:42:39 GMT -6
Context? For example, Lincoln suspended Habeus Corpus but with a vote from Congress to do so. This might be something he was referring. Andrew Jackson ignored the Supreme Court resulting in the Trail of Tears. The Democrats/Biden have ignored Supreme Court rulings and are using the presidency to institute legislation time and time again. Washington used the military to go after citizens in the Whiskey Rebellion which was an incident brought about by Hamilton pushing for legislation that would cause the rebellion. FDR put US Citizens in internment camps and took their land in WWII. That was a direct violation of those people's rights in so many ways including not giving them Habeus Corpus, government confiscation of private land, and disallowing them free speech and freedom.
She also said that he opposes the 2nd Amendment.
|
|
|
Post by Starbuck on Oct 29, 2024 8:01:22 GMT -6
Context? For example, Lincoln suspended Habeus Corpus but with a vote from Congress to do so. Incorrect. Lincoln, the only actual dictator in American history, suspended Habeus Corpus unilaterally AFTER requesting the Congress to authorize it and AFTER they refused to do so. He then proceeded to ignore a SCOTUS decision which ruled he had no legal authority to do so. Habeus Corpus was suspended to 2 years by Lincoln in complete rejection of Congress, Scotus, and the constitution. In fact, Lincoln actually stated the constitution itself placed the authority of the president above the text of the document. 2 years later, Congress did suspend Habeus Corpus - but provided strict and specific guidance for the condition under which it could be done. Naturally, Lincoln ignored every single requirement Congress put in place.
|
|
65
Senior Member
Posts: 557
|
Post by 65 on Oct 29, 2024 8:29:23 GMT -6
Now just fabricating new stuff out of thin air. Something new every day. Not something you do when your handlers think you are winning. No, it was not fabricated out of thin air. Harris embellished Trump’s monumentally stupid Truth Social post of Dec. 2022, a post so moronic even Ted Cruz condemned it. Did Harris stretch Trump’s intent? Probably. And every politician in the universe would have exploited Trump’s jaw-dropping ignorance. Here is the key language: “…A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Trump wrote on Truth Social on December 3, 2022. "Our great 'Founder' did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!"archive.ph/2022.12.04-234611/https://truthsocial.com/@realdonaldtrump/posts/109449803240069864stop defending Sugar you are embarrassing yourself
|
|
|
Post by gotmewrong on Oct 29, 2024 8:32:15 GMT -6
Now just fabricating new stuff out of thin air. Something new every day. Not something you do when your handlers think you are winning. No, it was not fabricated out of thin air. Harris embellished Trump’s monumentally stupid Truth Social post of Dec. 2022, a post so moronic even Ted Cruz condemned it. Did Harris stretch Trump’s intent? Probably. And every politician in the universe would have exploited Trump’s jaw-dropping ignorance. Here is the key language: “…A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Trump wrote on Truth Social on December 3, 2022. "Our great 'Founder' did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!"archive.ph/2022.12.04-234611/https://truthsocial.com/@realdonaldtrump/posts/109449803240069864Who are the ones who want to eliminate the electoral college?
|
|
|
Post by str8shooter on Oct 29, 2024 8:46:06 GMT -6
No, it was not fabricated out of thin air. Harris embellished Trump’s monumentally stupid Truth Social post of Dec. 2022, a post so moronic even Ted Cruz condemned it. Did Harris stretch Trump’s intent? Probably. And every politician in the universe would have exploited Trump’s jaw-dropping ignorance. Here is the key language: “…A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Trump wrote on Truth Social on December 3, 2022. "Our great 'Founder' did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!"archive.ph/2022.12.04-234611/https://truthsocial.com/@realdonaldtrump/posts/109449803240069864Who are the ones who want to eliminate the electoral college? Who are the ones who want to eliminate the filibuster?
|
|