|
|
Post by bedfordforrest on Jun 1, 2024 21:49:44 GMT -6
|
|
uncleb
Junior Member
Posts: 401
|
Post by uncleb on Jun 1, 2024 22:32:17 GMT -6
Have you ever thought that the reason Trump is losing is because he is guilty? Has that ever crossed your mind? |
|
|
|
Post by bedfordforrest on Jun 2, 2024 8:56:54 GMT -6
Have you ever thought that the reason Trump is losing is because he is guilty? Has that ever crossed your mind? If Trump was really losing, your side wouldn't have to use a biased judge trying a case using legal innovations never tried before. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2024 9:02:55 GMT -6
If I win, I win. If I lose, its a conspiracy.
That's where we are.
There is an irony here - it was long held that moral relativism was a liberal disease. But in the age of Trump, we see a party utterly captured by
it, with the added defect that the only real principle is fealty to the cult of personality of a single despicable individual.
|
|
uncleb
Junior Member
Posts: 401
|
Post by uncleb on Jun 2, 2024 9:09:14 GMT -6
Have you ever thought that the reason Trump is losing is because he is guilty? Has that ever crossed your mind? If Trump was really losing, your side wouldn't have to use a biased judge trying a case using legal innovations never tried before. The judge didnt find him guilty. Everyday jurors did. smh |
|
|
|
Post by johntchance on Jun 2, 2024 9:11:41 GMT -6
If Trump was really losing, your side wouldn't have to use a biased judge trying a case using legal innovations never tried before. The judge didnt find him guilty. Everyday jurors did. smh A judge has no effect on a jury!? |
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Jun 2, 2024 9:15:25 GMT -6
If Trump was really losing, your side wouldn't have to use a biased judge trying a case using legal innovations never tried before. The judge didnt find him guilty. Everyday jurors did. smh With massive help from the judge, which is why it's all going to get overturned! |
|
|
|
Post by bedfordforrest on Jun 2, 2024 9:35:33 GMT -6
If Trump was really losing, your side wouldn't have to use a biased judge trying a case using legal innovations never tried before. The judge didnt find him guilty. Everyday jurors did. smh Judges have no effect on a trial? Is that really the line you want to go with? |
|
|
|
Post by bedfordforrest on Jun 2, 2024 9:37:27 GMT -6
If I win, I win. If I lose, its a conspiracy. That's where we are. There is an irony here - it was long held that moral relativism was a liberal disease. But in the age of Trump, we see a party utterly captured by it, with the added defect that the only real principle is fealty to the cult of personality of a single despicable individual. For decades the right has been unwilling to wield power because of "muh norms". The left has never had such a problem. The right is coming around to the axiom of "the side that wants to be left alone will always lose to the side that wants to win." |
|
