|
|
Post by captbudman on Jun 13, 2024 15:00:50 GMT -6
After Trump's visit with Republican Senators, he gave a brief presser. Sen. Tim Scott and Sen. Marco Rubio walked out before President Trump's speech (as did Mittens Romney), while Ted Cruz and Sen. J.D. Vance stood behind President Trump while he was speaking. One can assume that Tim Scott and Little Marco have been scratched as VP candidates...  |
|
|
|
Post by 3 Sport Town on Jun 13, 2024 21:18:57 GMT -6
• S.C. Sen. Tim Scott - and he will lose to Kamala in a debate, • N.D. Gov. Doug Burgum - and he will lose to Kamala in a debate losing to Sidepiece in a debate is literally impossible. she offers up nothing but word salad. I guess you forgot, Harris beat Pence in 2020 according to polls, maybe that is why Trump supporters wanted to www.cnn.com/2020/10/07/politics/mike-pence-kamala-harris-vice-presidential-debate-poll/index.htmlMore Americans said Sen. Kamala Harris did the best job in the vice presidential debate Wednesday night, according to a CNN Instant Poll of registered voters who watched. About 6 in 10 (59%) said Harris won, while 38% said Vice President Mike Pence had the better night. |
|
|
|
Post by 3 Sport Town on Jun 13, 2024 21:21:07 GMT -6
After Trump's visit with Republican Senators, he gave a brief presser. Sen. Tim Scott and Sen. Marco Rubio walked out before President Trump's speech (as did Mittens Romney), while Ted Cruz and Sen. J.D. Vance stood behind President Trump while he was speaking. One can assume that Tim Scott and Little Marco have been scratched as VP candidates... It is possible they had a committee hearing or something, or maybe they can only kiss Trump’s butt for so long. |
|
|
|
Post by 3 Sport Town on Jun 13, 2024 21:23:25 GMT -6
No kidding. To even suggest that anyone with a 6 grade education would lose to Kumala is absurd. 3-squirts has zero credibility (or intelligence) on this or any topic requires common sense or intellect. No kidding. The night of the debate, unless Joe literally shits himself and leaves the stage during the debate, he will claim Joe won the debate. Trump has said something to the effect that Biden is the worst debater ever and cannot put two sentences together. So unless Biden “shits himself and leaves the stage during the debate” everyone will see it as a win for Biden. |
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Jun 14, 2024 6:41:04 GMT -6
losing to Sidepiece in a debate is literally impossible. she offers up nothing but word salad. I guess you forgot, Harris beat Pence in 2020 according to polls, maybe that is why Trump supporters wanted to www.cnn.com/2020/10/07/politics/mike-pence-kamala-harris-vice-presidential-debate-poll/index.htmlMore Americans said Sen. Kamala Harris did the best job in the vice presidential debate Wednesday night, according to a CNN Instant Poll of registered voters who watched. About 6 in 10 (59%) said Harris won, while 38% said Vice President Mike Pence had the better night. her silly "excuse me, Im talking" and "reclaiming my time" shit was so fucking lame. and everyone with a functioning brain can plainly see she is extremely under qualified for the position of VP |
|
|
|
Post by Starbuck on Jun 14, 2024 17:50:13 GMT -6
To me the pick has got to a person that can be President on day one. Not because I'm worried about DJT not being able to finish his term (although I wouldn't put it past one of the leftist crazies to take a shot at him) but because this VP need to be able to take the reins when he becomes President in four years. I look at this list and I like a lot of them but only one comes close to that and it's Burgham. I like Byron Donalds a lot but he has had serious legal problems (not the BS the Trump has been subject to) that will be a big problem. He is also a little young politically to be the VP. He also was a Democrat until 2010. The media will have a field day with him. I could definitely see him as Chief of Staff. I like Tim Scott but I don't think he's a serious/tenacious fighter (same with Ben Carson). He could be the DHS head. Elise Stefanik, I don't dislike her but she's very young. She needs a cabinet position because she's going nowhere as a Rep. From NY. There is no US Senate seat for her. Maybe Education Secretary. I still wish DeSantis was in the mix. Is Mike Pompeo interested in the position? We need a strong America First running mate that will push and fight for the agenda in the terms following Trump's (which DeSantis is the only one that has proven that he will actually do it). I cannot disagree with your assessment Nor do I. But Trump has "trumped" the media time after time after time. His "vetting list" is almost certainly more of the same. If I were a betting man, I would put Cotton and Youngkin at the top of the odds list. Burgum is most likely being held in reserve if for some reason either of the above cannot be selected or have no interest. |
|
|
|
Post by onemizzou on Jun 14, 2024 19:02:32 GMT -6
well if dipshits who watch commie news network say so, it must be true. her silly "excuse me, Im talking" and "reclaiming my time" shit was so fucking lame. and everyone with a functioning brain can plainly see she is extremely under qualified for the position of VP How do you become under qualified for VP, there are literally no requirements, which is why she's a perfect fit. |
|
|
|
Post by onemizzou on Jun 14, 2024 19:03:57 GMT -6
I cannot disagree with your assessment Nor do I. But Trump has "trumped" the media time after time after time. His "vetting list" is almost certainly more of the same. If I were a betting man, I would put Cotton and Youngkin at the top of the odds list. Burgum is most likely being held in reserve if for some reason either of the above cannot be selected or have no interest. For some reason I don't care for Youngkin and while I do like Cotton I'm not sure he's President material. |
|
|
|
Post by Starbuck on Jun 14, 2024 19:33:21 GMT -6
Nor do I. But Trump has "trumped" the media time after time after time. His "vetting list" is almost certainly more of the same. If I were a betting man, I would put Cotton and Youngkin at the top of the odds list. Burgum is most likely being held in reserve if for some reason either of the above cannot be selected or have no interest. For some reason I don't care for Youngkin and while I do like Cotton I'm not sure he's President material. If Trump wins Virginia it is virtually impossible for Biden to carve a pathway to 270 electoral votes, even with the hundreds of thousands of ballots he will of course have harvested in other states. That gives Trump a powerful incentive to pick Youngkin - and doing so provides the added benefit of him being acceptable to all REP constituencies, as well as moderate DEMs and independents. As for Cotton, Trump was a disaster on most fronts legislatively and accomplished very little other than tax cuts. Seems probable he would want to actually attempt to get some things done with congress if he does win re-election. Otherwise, why run? Cotton would be an asset in that regard. And again - would not really alienate his base or any swayable voters. I am not endorsing either man necessarily, simply explaining what Trump is doubtless considering. |
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Jun 16, 2024 10:30:09 GMT -6
@polymarket - Republican Vice Presidential Odds (shift since June 9) • Doug Burgum: 27% (+11) • Tim Scott: 14% (-10) • Ben Carson: 14% (+7) • J.D. Vance: 12% (-2) • Marco Rubio: 10% (-2) • Byron Donalds: 7% (+5) • Sarah H. Sanders: 6% (+1) Who do YOU think should be Trump's VP? polymarket.com/event/republican-vp-nominee?tid=1716862943111 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2024 17:06:55 GMT -6
It actually should be called the creepstakes.
|
|
|
|
Post by onemizzou on Jun 16, 2024 18:23:06 GMT -6
For some reason I don't care for Youngkin and while I do like Cotton I'm not sure he's President material. If Trump wins Virginia it is virtually impossible for Biden to carve a pathway to 270 electoral votes, even with the hundreds of thousands of ballots he will of course have harvested in other states. That gives Trump a powerful incentive to pick Youngkin - and doing so provides the added benefit of him being acceptable to all REP constituencies, as well as moderate DEMs and independents. As for Cotton, Trump was a disaster on most fronts legislatively and accomplished very little other than tax cuts. Seems probable he would want to actually attempt to get some things done with congress if he does win re-election. Otherwise, why run? Cotton would be an asset in that regard. And again - would not really alienate his base or any swayable voters. I am not endorsing either man necessarily, simply explaining what Trump is doubtless considering. I get the Virginia angle with Youngkin but I don't know if he carries that much weight. They lost the entire Virginia state congress the last election so I don't know if he'd actually help win Virginia for Trump. |
|
|
|
Post by onemizzou on Jun 16, 2024 18:24:17 GMT -6
@polymarket - Republican Vice Presidential Odds (shift since June 9) • Doug Burgum: 27% (+11) • Tim Scott: 14% (-10) • Ben Carson: 14% (+7) • J.D. Vance: 12% (-2) • Marco Rubio: 10% (-2) • Byron Donalds: 7% (+5) • Sarah H. Sanders: 6% (+1) Who do YOU think should be Trump's VP? polymarket.com/event/republican-vp-nominee?tid=1716862943111Out of those, it's Burgam. |
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Jun 16, 2024 19:57:33 GMT -6
A poll from the recent rally in Detroit shows JD Vance popular with the Trump base.
|
|
|
|
Post by Starbuck on Jun 17, 2024 7:24:32 GMT -6
If Trump wins Virginia it is virtually impossible for Biden to carve a pathway to 270 electoral votes, even with the hundreds of thousands of ballots he will of course have harvested in other states. That gives Trump a powerful incentive to pick Youngkin - and doing so provides the added benefit of him being acceptable to all REP constituencies, as well as moderate DEMs and independents. As for Cotton, Trump was a disaster on most fronts legislatively and accomplished very little other than tax cuts. Seems probable he would want to actually attempt to get some things done with congress if he does win re-election. Otherwise, why run? Cotton would be an asset in that regard. And again - would not really alienate his base or any swayable voters. I am not endorsing either man necessarily, simply explaining what Trump is doubtless considering. I get the Virginia angle with Youngkin but I don't know if he carries that much weight. They lost the entire Virginia state congress the last election so I don't know if he'd actually help win Virginia for Trump. A fair point. |
|
