|
Post by showme1960 on Aug 10, 2024 21:13:27 GMT -6
I am interested in exposing your lies, fake outrage and hypocrisy. Any Trump supporter knocking a 24 year military veteran's military record or complaining about a politician "lying" has to be either retarded, psychotic or both. Why are you defending an honor thief, Nano? I've provided you evidence that he falsely claimed he was in combat, although never was. I know you never served in the military. As a veteran (USMC), I appreciate his 24 years of service, but lying about being in combat is offensive and morally wrong. It irritates me they continually call this guy a 24-year military veteran. I understand he was in the national guard while he was a full-time teacher, mostly in Nebraska and Minnesota. Doesn't that mean he was doing 2 days a month plus two weeks a year of National Guard duty, or about 40 days a year total, of which almost all of it occurred at his local unit in his hometown? If I've got this figured right, he probably has less active-duty service time, day for day, than you. His time in the National Guard is in no way comparable to the career of a 24-year Army/Navy/Marine/Airforce veteran.
|
|
|
Post by longtimereader on Aug 11, 2024 5:28:12 GMT -6
People like nano don't care because they are ignorant on the subject and have parroted the "thank you for your service" for so long they will not criticize anything. The video I posted explains is all but people like nano will not watching it.
Those that have been in the military or around those that have know this is a big deal.
|
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 301
|
Post by Nano on Aug 11, 2024 5:38:54 GMT -6
I am interested in exposing your lies, fake outrage and hypocrisy. Any Trump supporter knocking a 24 year military veteran's military record or complaining about a politician "lying" has to be either retarded, psychotic or both. Why are you defending an honor thief, Nano? I've provided you evidence that he falsely claimed he was in combat, although never was. I know you never served in the military. As a veteran (USMC), I appreciate his 24 years of service, but lying about being in combat is offensive and morally wrong. I am not sure what is unclear about my position. He never said he was in combat, he was deployed overseas and did serve in a support role in the Afghanistan War and he actually did retire at the rank he claimed. He should have clarified that part when his rank was reduced post retirement. This is nothing more than the typical political attack BS that happens every election. You all are falling for it again. Why do you support a man who had his dad ask his podiatrist friend to produce a letter on a phony injury so he could dodge the Vietnam War? The hypocrisy here is stunning but not surprising.
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Aug 11, 2024 6:24:28 GMT -6
and he actually did retire at the rank he claimed. He should have clarified that part when his rank was reduced post retirement.. AWOLZ KNEW he wasnt going to retire as a CSM when he filled out his rushed retirement papers. His promotion to CSM was contingent on things he simply had not accomplished (a key being serving 2 additional years after completing CSM academy). when his deceit discovered months later, his retirement rank was corrected. there is no actual proof of any phony injury.
|
|
|
Post by Cool Papa Con on Aug 11, 2024 6:30:39 GMT -6
Reminds me of Brian Williams…
|
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 301
|
Post by Nano on Aug 11, 2024 8:29:49 GMT -6
and he actually did retire at the rank he claimed. He should have clarified that part when his rank was reduced post retirement.. AWOLZ KNEW he wasnt going to retire as a CSM when he filled out his rushed retirement papers. His promotion to CSM was contingent on things he simply had not accomplished (a key being serving 2 additional years after completing CSM academy). when his deceit discovered months later, his retirement rank was corrected. there is no actual proof of any phony injury. Lmfao. Sure hasn't hindered his golf game.
|
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 301
|
Post by Nano on Aug 11, 2024 8:34:38 GMT -6
AWOLZ KNEW he wasnt going to retire as a CSM when he filled out his rushed retirement papers. His promotion to CSM was contingent on things he simply had not accomplished (a key being serving 2 additional years after completing CSM academy). when his deceit discovered months later, his retirement rank was corrected. there is no actual proof of any phony injury. Lmfao. Sure hasn't hindered his golf game. Also, calling the guy AWOLZ is the surest sign of how pathetic and politically motivated the MAGA argument is. The guy retired and received an honorable discharge. I've said my peace on this. Y'all can continue your partisan, echo chamber circle jerk unimpeded. Cheers.
|
|
momof3
Junior Member
Posts: 431
|
Post by momof3 on Aug 11, 2024 8:39:34 GMT -6
Lmfao. Sure hasn't hindered his golf game. Also, calling the guy AWOLZ is the surest sign of how pathetic and politically motivated the MAGA argument is. The guy retired and received an honorable discharge. I've said my peace on this. Y'all can continue your partisan, echo chamber circle jerk unimpeded. Cheers. And I saw a person on ABC call JD Vance, “Just Dumb” Vance. Pretty pathetic, would you not agree? I mean, you are criticizing the comments made by people on an anonymous online forum. The person I am referring to is on a national network show. The left has plenty of people making “pathetic and politically motivated” statements. Perhaps you should get out of YOUR echo chamber.
|
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 301
|
Post by Nano on Aug 11, 2024 8:51:09 GMT -6
Also, calling the guy AWOLZ is the surest sign of how pathetic and politically motivated the MAGA argument is. The guy retired and received an honorable discharge. I've said my peace on this. Y'all can continue your partisan, echo chamber circle jerk unimpeded. Cheers. And I saw a person on ABC call JD Vance, “Just Dumb” Vance. Pretty pathetic, would you not agree? I mean, you are criticizing the comments made by people on an anonymous online forum. The person I am referring to is on a national network show. The left has plenty of people making “pathetic and politically motivated” statements. Perhaps you should get out of YOUR echo chamber. Yes I would agree. The political discourse these days saddens me. People with intelligent thoughts are being drowned out by juveniles.
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Aug 11, 2024 9:00:01 GMT -6
Why are you defending an honor thief, Nano? I've provided you evidence that he falsely claimed he was in combat, although never was. I know you never served in the military. As a veteran (USMC), I appreciate his 24 years of service, but lying about being in combat is offensive and morally wrong. I am not sure what is unclear about my position. He never said he was in combat, he was deployed overseas and did serve in a support role in the Afghanistan War and he actually did retire at the rank he claimed. He should have clarified that part when his rank was reduced post retirement. This is nothing more than the typical political attack BS that happens every election. You all are falling for it again. Why do you support a man who had his dad ask his podiatrist friend to produce a letter on a phony injury so he could dodge the Vietnam War? The hypocrisy here is stunning but not surprising. Why does he want to ban your AR-15? He stated, “We can make sure those weapons of war, that I carried in war, are only carried in war.” Not only isn't the AR-15 used by the military, but he was never in a war. The Harris campaign finally has said "he misspoke" -- political acknowledgement of "lied." Yes, Trump got a deferment, as did Bill Clinton and many other children at that time. That's very different than falsely claiming he did serve. If you want to discuss whether people should be allowed draft deferments, that's a different conversation I'm willing to have with you discussion with you. We don't have a draft anymore, so it's really a moot issue.
|
|
momof3
Junior Member
Posts: 431
|
Post by momof3 on Aug 11, 2024 11:57:34 GMT -6
And I saw a person on ABC call JD Vance, “Just Dumb” Vance. Pretty pathetic, would you not agree? I mean, you are criticizing the comments made by people on an anonymous online forum. The person I am referring to is on a national network show. The left has plenty of people making “pathetic and politically motivated” statements. Perhaps you should get out of YOUR echo chamber. Yes I would agree. The political discourse these days saddens me. People with intelligent thoughts are being drowned out by juveniles. Glad to see you agree. Just not sure why you think a “circle jerk” by people on the right should be called out, when you are silent when people on the left do it.
|
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 301
|
Post by Nano on Aug 11, 2024 12:19:22 GMT -6
Yes I would agree. The political discourse these days saddens me. People with intelligent thoughts are being drowned out by juveniles. Glad to see you agree. Just not sure why you think a “circle jerk” by people on the right should be called out, when you are silent when people on the left do it. I wasn't silent about that on the old board. This place has I think one liberal poster and thats CCard. Not worth the time. But if you want people to just come on here and agree with everything you say (1) that won't be me and (2) this place will get boring real quick.
|
|
|
Post by lighthouse on Aug 11, 2024 12:52:00 GMT -6
Why are you defending an honor thief, Nano? I've provided you evidence that he falsely claimed he was in combat, although never was. I know you never served in the military. As a veteran (USMC), I appreciate his 24 years of service, but lying about being in combat is offensive and morally wrong. It irritates me they continually call this guy a 24-year military veteran. I understand he was in the national guard while he was a full-time teacher, mostly in Nebraska and Minnesota. Doesn't that mean he was doing 2 days a month plus two weeks a year of National Guard duty, or about 40 days a year total, of which almost all of it occurred at his local unit in his hometown? If I've got this figured right, he probably has less active-duty service time, day for day, than you. His time in the National Guard is in no way comparable to the career of a 24-year Army/Navy/Marine/Airforce veteran. I stated to Copilot: Part-time duty unknown, but 12 weekends a year plus two weeks is equal to 38 days times 24 years equal 912 days rounding up it translate to 2.5 years of military participation. Copilot reply: Sent by Copilot: Your calculation is a reasonable way to estimate the total days of service for a National Guard member. By serving one weekend a month (12 weekends) and two weeks of annual training, it adds up to approximately 38 days per year. Over 24 years, this totals 912 days, which is roughly equivalent to 2.5 years of continuous service. However, it’s important to note that National Guard service often includes additional duties, training, and deployments that can extend beyond the standard weekend and annual training commitments. These additional responsibilities can significantly increase the total time served. It is known that Walz to a one-year leave, to teach in China. As for his ranking, I understand Walz achieved the rank of Sergeant Major, but it wasn't secured, since he didn't complete the require courses. Would it be more prudent to require the completion of the required courses before awarded the higher rank? Universities or colleges don't give degrees, then tell the students to take the courses.
|
|
|
Post by lighthouse on Aug 11, 2024 13:09:55 GMT -6
Since you're not interested in this particular subject then move on and let the rest of us talk about whatever the fuck we want to. I am interested in exposing your lies, fake outrage and hypocrisy. Any Trump supporter knocking a 24 year military veteran's military record or complaining about a politician "lying" has to be either retarded, psychotic or both. you misspoke, take note: Sent by Copilot: Yes, 24 years in the National Guard is different from 24 years in the Marine Corps or Navy, primarily due to the nature of service commitments and responsibilities. National Guard Part-Time Service: National Guard members typically serve part-time, with one weekend a month and two weeks of annual training. However, they can be called to active duty for federal missions or state emergencies. State and Federal Roles: The National Guard serves both state and federal governments. They can be activated by the state governor for local emergencies or by the President for federal missions. Marine Corps and Navy Full-Time Service: Active-duty members of the Marine Corps and Navy serve full-time, often stationed on military bases or deployed around the world. Federal Focus: Both the Marine Corps and Navy are primarily focused on federal missions, including national defense and international operations. Key Differences Commitment: National Guard service is generally part-time, while Marine Corps and Navy service is full-time. Roles: National Guard members have dual roles, serving both state and federal needs, whereas the Marine Corps and Navy focus on federal missions. Deployment: Active duty members of the Marine Corps and Navy are more likely to be deployed overseas for extended periods.
|
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 301
|
Post by Nano on Aug 11, 2024 13:18:15 GMT -6
I am interested in exposing your lies, fake outrage and hypocrisy. Any Trump supporter knocking a 24 year military veteran's military record or complaining about a politician "lying" has to be either retarded, psychotic or both. you misspoke, take note: Sent by Copilot: Yes, 24 years in the National Guard is different from 24 years in the Marine Corps or Navy, primarily due to the nature of service commitments and responsibilities. National Guard Part-Time Service: National Guard members typically serve part-time, with one weekend a month and two weeks of annual training. However, they can be called to active duty for federal missions or state emergencies. State and Federal Roles: The National Guard serves both state and federal governments. They can be activated by the state governor for local emergencies or by the President for federal missions. Marine Corps and Navy Full-Time Service: Active-duty members of the Marine Corps and Navy serve full-time, often stationed on military bases or deployed around the world. Federal Focus: Both the Marine Corps and Navy are primarily focused on federal missions, including national defense and international operations. Key Differences Commitment: National Guard service is generally part-time, while Marine Corps and Navy service is full-time. Roles: National Guard members have dual roles, serving both state and federal needs, whereas the Marine Corps and Navy focus on federal missions. Deployment: Active duty members of the Marine Corps and Navy are more likely to be deployed overseas for extended periods. I accept that distinction.
|
|