|
|
Post by arative on Aug 30, 2024 21:03:05 GMT -6
The decision came as the result of an appeal by an illegal alien named Jose Paz Medina-Cantu, who had been arrested in Texas in 2022 by the Border Patrol. He was charged with illegal possession of a handgun, and illegally re-entering the country after having already been deported.
Although he pleaded guilty to the charges, his lawyers argued during his appeal that the gun charge was a violation of his Constitutional rights. In their appeal, the lawyers cited the landmark Supreme Court decision in the 2022 case New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, where the court ruled in a 6-3 majority that Americans do not have to provide a reason when seeking a concealed-carry permit. This ruling has led to numerous anti-gun laws across the country being challenged in court, with many being overturned based on Bruen’s precedent.
After hearing the appeal of the illegal’s lawyers, the three-judge panel ruled that the rights granted to American citizens by the Constitution do not apply to illegals.So none of the constitution applies to illegals because they aren't US citizens.They have no right to a hearing, a trial or to stand before a judge either, time to round them up and give the a choice, they can leave or they can get taxpayer funded lead.
|
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Aug 31, 2024 6:22:22 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Aug 31, 2024 7:11:05 GMT -6
The decision came as the result of an appeal by an illegal alien named Jose Paz Medina-Cantu, who had been arrested in Texas in 2022 by the Border Patrol. He was charged with illegal possession of a handgun, and illegally re-entering the country after having already been deported.
Although he pleaded guilty to the charges, his lawyers argued during his appeal that the gun charge was a violation of his Constitutional rights. In their appeal, the lawyers cited the landmark Supreme Court decision in the 2022 case New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, where the court ruled in a 6-3 majority that Americans do not have to provide a reason when seeking a concealed-carry permit. This ruling has led to numerous anti-gun laws across the country being challenged in court, with many being overturned based on Bruen’s precedent.
After hearing the appeal of the illegal’s lawyers, the three-judge panel ruled that the rights granted to American citizens by the Constitution do not apply to illegals.So none of the constitution applies to illegals because they aren't US citizens.They have no right to a hearing, a trial or to stand before a judge either, time to round them up and give the a choice, they can leave or they can get taxpayer funded lead. That's what I said to hubby but I don't think they meant all rights - just Second Amendment! However, I could very well be wrong! For that matter, so could the judges! |
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Aug 31, 2024 7:24:25 GMT -6
The decision came as the result of an appeal by an illegal alien named Jose Paz Medina-Cantu, who had been arrested in Texas in 2022 by the Border Patrol. He was charged with illegal possession of a handgun, and illegally re-entering the country after having already been deported.
Although he pleaded guilty to the charges, his lawyers argued during his appeal that the gun charge was a violation of his Constitutional rights. In their appeal, the lawyers cited the landmark Supreme Court decision in the 2022 case New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, where the court ruled in a 6-3 majority that Americans do not have to provide a reason when seeking a concealed-carry permit. This ruling has led to numerous anti-gun laws across the country being challenged in court, with many being overturned based on Bruen’s precedent.
After hearing the appeal of the illegal’s lawyers, the three-judge panel ruled that the rights granted to American citizens by the Constitution do not apply to illegals.So none of the constitution applies to illegals because they aren't US citizens.They have no right to a hearing, a trial or to stand before a judge either, time to round them up and give the a choice, they can leave or they can get taxpayer funded lead. That's what I said to hubby but I don't think they meant all rights - just Second Amendment! However, I could very well be wrong! For that matter, so could the judges! This case may only apply to 2A, but how can any Judge nitpick and say 2A doesnt apply to illegals, but 1A or 4A or any A does. |
|
emerald
Banned User
CCard sock
Posts: 2,632
|
Post by emerald on Aug 31, 2024 7:47:12 GMT -6
That's what I said to hubby but I don't think they meant all rights - just Second Amendment! However, I could very well be wrong! For that matter, so could the judges! This case may only apply to 2A, but how can any Judge nitpick and say 2A doesnt apply to illegals, but 1A or 4A or any A does. Wonder how the NRA feels about this. That's going to cut into their sales. LOL |
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Aug 31, 2024 8:06:07 GMT -6
the NRA doesnt sell firearms.
|
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Aug 31, 2024 8:24:25 GMT -6
That's what I said to hubby but I don't think they meant all rights - just Second Amendment! However, I could very well be wrong! For that matter, so could the judges! This case may only apply to 2A, but how can any Judge nitpick and say 2A doesnt apply to illegals, but 1A or 4A or any A does. I agree with you but we see it every day! Hell, they get more rights than Citizens do or so it seems! |
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Aug 31, 2024 8:26:16 GMT -6
the NRA doesnt sell firearms. ROFLAMO! You just can't fix stupid! You mean you've never been to their store and bought anything?  |
|
