Post by moody on Sept 16, 2024 12:25:16 GMT -6
An alleged ABC whistleblower has made some shocking claims about last week’s debate. Not only did Harris receive the questions in advance, it was also decided that Trump would be daft-checked and Harris would not be. Here is a link to the sworn affidavit from the whistleblower.
Claims are as follows:
Claims are as follows:
The Harris campaign received particular accommodations, including, but not limited to, the providing of a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump, and assurances regarding split-screen television views that would favorably impact Kamala Harris’s appearance relative to Donald Trump,” the whistleblower testified.
“It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to fact-checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company that Donald Trump would be fact checked. In fact, various people were assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate. In fact, Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations.”
“To my understanding, any rules negotiated and conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump and Harris campaign involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on the call.”[\quote]
These subjects were off-limits for Harris:
“It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to fact-checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company that Donald Trump would be fact checked. In fact, various people were assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate. In fact, Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations.”
“To my understanding, any rules negotiated and conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump and Harris campaign involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on the call.”[\quote]
These subjects were off-limits for Harris:
No questions regarding the perceived health of Joe Biden.
No inquiries related to her tenure as Attorney General in San Francisco.
No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and who may be involved in her administration if elected.
No inquiries related to her tenure as Attorney General in San Francisco.
No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and who may be involved in her administration if elected.
