Aesa
Junior Member
Posts: 197 
|
Post by Aesa on Sept 21, 2024 12:49:43 GMT -6
Sidepiece has accepted CNN'S offer for a second debate in October, hell no. She has had her chance with a corrupt liberal stacked debate. Let FOXNews be the host with these rules...
1) NO pivoting, diverting or deflecting away from the original question under penalty of loosing alloted speaking time which would be added to the opponents speaking time.
2) Opponent's mic to be muted while other person is speaking.
3) Direct questions must be answered with direct and specific answers.
4) Any false claim answers will be fact checked by the moderators.
I'm sure that other rules can/will be added but these are the most important in my mind.
If Sidepiece will not agree to the conditions, it just means what we already know she can't compete in a neutral debate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Sept 21, 2024 12:53:20 GMT -6
they want it on Oct 26, like a week before the election.
Do it now.
Each campaign picks the questioner for the other
|
|
Aesa
Junior Member
Posts: 197
|
Post by Aesa on Sept 21, 2024 12:55:33 GMT -6
they want it on Oct 26, like a week before the election. Do it now. Each campaign picks the questioner for the other I like your additions and it should be within the next 10 days. But Each moderator should be from Fox or, I fear, fact checking will not be balanced. I trust the liberal media as far as I can throw the Arch downtown. The questions should be picked by FOX and kept under lock and key. At least we could be confident they would not be leaked |
|
momof3
Junior Member
Posts: 431
|
Post by momof3 on Sept 21, 2024 14:38:56 GMT -6
Fox invited Harris to do a debate on their network. It is telling that she didn’t accept that invitation. Trump should tell her he will do the CNN debate if she first does one on Fox.
|
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Sept 21, 2024 16:29:06 GMT -6
Fox invited Harris to do a debate on their network. It is telling that she didn’t accept that invitation. Trump should tell her he will do the CNN debate if she first does one on Fox. Great idea. He's done 2 debates on their terms and their networks. It's safe because she won't do an FNC debate |
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Sept 21, 2024 17:22:42 GMT -6
Sidepiece has accepted CNN'S offer for a second debate in October, hell no. She has had her chance with a corrupt liberal stacked debate. Let FOXNews be the host with these rules... 1) NO pivoting, diverting or deflecting away from the original question under penalty of loosing alloted speaking time which would be added to the opponents speaking time. 2) Opponent's mic to be muted while other person is speaking. 3) Direct questions must be answered with direct and specific answers. 4) Any false claim answers will be fact checked by the moderators. I'm sure that other rules can/will be added but these are the most important in my mind. If Sidepiece will not agree to the conditions, it just means what we already know she can't compete in a neutral debate. She had her chance for a second debate and she raised her nose at it - agree on HELL NO, especially with CNN |
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Sept 21, 2024 17:52:53 GMT -6
Sidepiece wont even show up to the Al Smith charity dinner.
|
|
|
|
Post by cardiological on Sept 21, 2024 19:25:07 GMT -6
Sidepiece has accepted CNN'S offer for a second debate in October, hell no. She has had her chance with a corrupt liberal stacked debate. Let FOXNews be the host with these rules... 1) NO pivoting, diverting or deflecting away from the original question under penalty of loosing alloted speaking time which would be added to the opponents speaking time. 2) Opponent's mic to be muted while other person is speaking. 3) Direct questions must be answered with direct and specific answers. 4) Any false claim answers will be fact checked by the moderators. I'm sure that other rules can/will be added but these are the most important in my mind. If Sidepiece will not agree to the conditions, it just means what we already know she can't compete in a neutral debate.
“I shouldn’t knock CNN because I actually thought they treated me very fairly last night. Very professional, both of them. Jake and Dana, they treated me very fairly,” Trump said to a Virginia crowd in comments highlighted by Mediaite. thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4747126-trump-lauds-debate-moderators-they-treated-me-very-fairly/That was the consensus among conservative pundits as well. That said, I agree any additional debate should be hosted by FOX. |
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Sept 21, 2024 19:39:41 GMT -6
Sidepiece has accepted CNN'S offer for a second debate in October, hell no. She has had her chance with a corrupt liberal stacked debate. Let FOXNews be the host with these rules... 1) NO pivoting, diverting or deflecting away from the original question under penalty of loosing alloted speaking time which would be added to the opponents speaking time. 2) Opponent's mic to be muted while other person is speaking. 3) Direct questions must be answered with direct and specific answers. 4) Any false claim answers will be fact checked by the moderators. I'm sure that other rules can/will be added but these are the most important in my mind. If Sidepiece will not agree to the conditions, it just means what we already know she can't compete in a neutral debate.
“I shouldn’t knock CNN because I actually thought they treated me very fairly last night. Very professional, both of them. Jake and Dana, they treated me very fairly,” Trump said to a Virginia crowd in comments highlighted by Mediaite. thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4747126-trump-lauds-debate-moderators-they-treated-me-very-fairly/That was the consensus among conservative pundits as well. That said, I agree any additional debate should be hosted by FOX. I agree with you that it should be Fox New's turn if there was a debate. That said, it's foolish for Trump to agree to any debate with Kamala just a few weeks before the election. With voting no longer being on "election day," but instead "election season," it's likely that 1/3 to 1/2 of those who are going to vote this year will have done so ( many Dems and Illegal immigrants having done so early and often!). This attempt to get a new debate schedule makes me wonder -- how bad are Kamala's internal polling numbers? Most of the polls show Kamala ahead, but they seem to be oversampling Democrats |
|
Aesa
Junior Member
Posts: 197
|
Post by Aesa on Sept 21, 2024 20:02:45 GMT -6
Former President Trump said at a rally Friday that he thought CNN’s presidential debate moderators, Dana Bash and Jake Tapper, treated him “very fairly” on Thursday night.
“I shouldn’t knock CNN because I actually thought they treated me very fairly last night. Very professional, both of them. Jake and Dana, they treated me very fairly,” Trump said to a Virginia crowd in comments highlighted by Mediaite. thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4747126-trump-lauds-debate-moderators-they-treated-me-very-fairly/That was the consensus among conservative pundits as well. That said, I agree any additional debate should be hosted by FOX. I agree with you that it should be Fox New's turn if there was a debate. That said, it's foolish for Trump to agree to any debate with Kamala just a few weeks before the election. With voting no longer being on "election day," but instead "election season," it's likely that 1/3 to 1/2 of those who are going to vote this year will have done so ( many Dems and Illegal immigrants having done so early and often!). This attempt to get a new debate schedule makes me wonder -- how bad are Kamala's internal polling numbers? Most of the polls show Kamala ahead, but they seem to be oversampling Democrats I am of the opinion that EVERY poll conducted by the left has artificially inflated her numbers. In other words... they are lying as much as Sidepiece. |
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Sept 21, 2024 20:59:00 GMT -6
I agree with you that it should be Fox New's turn if there was a debate. That said, it's foolish for Trump to agree to any debate with Kamala just a few weeks before the election. With voting no longer being on "election day," but instead "election season," it's likely that 1/3 to 1/2 of those who are going to vote this year will have done so ( many Dems and Illegal immigrants having done so early and often!). This attempt to get a new debate schedule makes me wonder -- how bad are Kamala's internal polling numbers? Most of the polls show Kamala ahead, but they seem to be oversampling Democrats I am of the opinion that EVERY poll conducted by the left has artificially inflated her numbers. In other words... they are lying as much as Sidepiece. The late Rush Limbaugh talked about this. He called the tactic "depression polling." By lying and showing Kamala ahead, the idea would be that conservatives would think they race is over. Hence, they wouldn't vote for their candidate (in this case Trump) nor donate to help support their candidates. The other reason now that I can see for the fake polls is to give the impression that Kamala is winning. That way, although Trump will be ahead, when the create votes they'll be able to say "our polling told us she would win."  |
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Sept 22, 2024 6:49:10 GMT -6
Former President Trump said at a rally Friday that he thought CNN’s presidential debate moderators, Dana Bash and Jake Tapper, treated him “very fairly” on Thursday night.
“I shouldn’t knock CNN because I actually thought they treated me very fairly last night. Very professional, both of them. Jake and Dana, they treated me very fairly,” Trump said to a Virginia crowd in comments highlighted by Mediaite. thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4747126-trump-lauds-debate-moderators-they-treated-me-very-fairly/That was the consensus among conservative pundits as well. That said, I agree any additional debate should be hosted by FOX. I agree with you that it should be Fox New's turn if there was a debate. That said, it's foolish for Trump to agree to any debate with Kamala just a few weeks before the election. With voting no longer being on "election day," but instead "election season," it's likely that 1/3 to 1/2 of those who are going to vote this year will have done so ( many Dems and Illegal immigrants having done so early and often!). This attempt to get a new debate schedule makes me wonder -- how bad are Kamala's internal polling numbers? Most of the polls show Kamala ahead, but they seem to be oversampling Democrats I'm reading lots of worrying and discontent among Democrats so her numbers must be worse than we are being made aware of, as usual. IMO, Trump was right to refuse the debate - it's too late and Harris only has herself to blame - but eventually, it'll be Trump's fault!! |
|
|
|
Post by Starbuck on Sept 22, 2024 18:45:20 GMT -6
Fox invited Harris to do a debate on their network. It is telling that she didn’t accept that invitation. Trump should tell her he will do the CNN debate if she first does one on Fox. One, Trump believes he is winning in enough swing states to reach 270 electoral votes and knows the first debate with Harris was a disaster for him - therefore, he sees all downside and zero upside to doing another. Two, Harris trashed Trump in their debate and knows she will be getting nothing but support from the media in offering a second go-round that was sure to be rejected - she sees all upside and no downside in making her insincere offer. Three, I would like to see a FOX/CBS co-hosted townhall debate with randomly selected attendees opening sealed envelopes to read questions. Four, I would like to allow zero follow-up questions from the moderators and would instead permit them to only repeat an audience question verbatim if it was ducked by one of the candidates the first time. Five, it will not happen and would not matter if it did since only 2 things will determine the outcome: "Can the media produce yet another fake scandal with which to attack and damage Trump", and "Can the DEMs cheat by a large enough margin in a few close states to rig the election?". |
|
|
|
Post by keefdaman on Sept 23, 2024 17:26:21 GMT -6
Former President Trump said at a rally Friday that he thought CNN’s presidential debate moderators, Dana Bash and Jake Tapper, treated him “very fairly” on Thursday night.
“I shouldn’t knock CNN because I actually thought they treated me very fairly last night. Very professional, both of them. Jake and Dana, they treated me very fairly,” Trump said to a Virginia crowd in comments highlighted by Mediaite. thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4747126-trump-lauds-debate-moderators-they-treated-me-very-fairly/That was the consensus among conservative pundits as well. That said, I agree any additional debate should be hosted by FOX. I agree with you that it should be Fox New's turn if there was a debate. That said, it's foolish for Trump to agree to any debate with Kamala just a few weeks before the election. With voting no longer being on "election day," but instead "election season," it's likely that 1/3 to 1/2 of those who are going to vote this year will have done so ( many Dems and Illegal immigrants having done so early and often!). This attempt to get a new debate schedule makes me wonder -- how bad are Kamala's internal polling numbers? Most of the polls show Kamala ahead, but they seem to be oversampling Democrats They are oversampling democrats, Most pollsters are liberals. This is like Clinton in 2016. |
|
