|
Post by stargatebabe on Oct 29, 2024 12:28:17 GMT -6
This year’s vote count will be faster, but it still might take time to know who wonBallots will be counted faster this year than in 2020 — but everyone should still be prepared for a long night, if not a couple days of waiting.
Fewer votes will be cast by mail compared with during the pandemic, and some states have tweaked their laws to speed up the count. The single biggest factor that will determine when Americans know the winner is, however, out of the control of election workers: the margin of victory in key states.
And this year’s close election means the last ballot could be determinative — which means waiting.
“It should be sooner, but also be patient,” said Barb Byrum, the Ingham County, Michigan, clerk. “It takes time to make sure that we are still following our security and our procedures.”
Here are the three biggest factors that will decide when the next president could be known.Read more @ www.politico.com/news/2024/10/29/election-day-vote-count-race-calls-time-00185569Getting their excuses all lined up and ready to go...........
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Oct 29, 2024 13:59:36 GMT -6
with the leads Trump is apparently opening up in early voting across the country, it'll be interesting to see how big a lead he needs in some states (PA) for them to be called.
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Oct 29, 2024 14:46:14 GMT -6
with the leads Trump is apparently opening up in early voting across the country, it'll be interesting to see how big a lead he needs in some states (PA) for them to be called. That won't stop the Dems from trying. Yesterday a Nevada judge said that ballots w/o post marks can be accepted up to three days after the election. The Democrat printing presses are likely already working as I type this.
|
|
|
Post by Aesa on Oct 29, 2024 14:50:19 GMT -6
with the leads Trump is apparently opening up in early voting across the country, it'll be interesting to see how big a lead he needs in some states (PA) for them to be called. That won't stop the Dems from trying. Yesterday a Nevada judge said that ballots w/o post marks can be accepted up to three days after the election. The Democrat printing presses are likely already working as I type this. This needs to be appealed to the SC immediately.
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Oct 29, 2024 14:52:32 GMT -6
with the leads Trump is apparently opening up in early voting across the country, it'll be interesting to see how big a lead he needs in some states (PA) for them to be called. That won't stop the Dems from trying. Yesterday a Nevada judge said that ballots w/o post marks can be accepted up to three days after the election. The Democrat printing presses are likely already working as I type this. but there is the plausibility factor. Lets say Reps are leading early and mail in balloting in a swing state; shows a record turn out on Tuesday while dems stay flat. Then 3-4 days later they miraculously WIN? Like Tucker said, NO ONE would believe it* *Thats not to say they wont do it, just that no one will believe them
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Oct 29, 2024 15:31:55 GMT -6
That won't stop the Dems from trying. Yesterday a Nevada judge said that ballots w/o post marks can be accepted up to three days after the election. The Democrat printing presses are likely already working as I type this. but there is the plausibility factor. Lets say Reps are leading early and mail in balloting in a swing state; shows a record turn out on Tuesday while dems stay flat. Then 3-4 days later they miraculously WIN? Like Tucker said, NO ONE would believe it* *Thats not to say they wont do it, just that no one will believe them I think that's why the MSM's polls are so misleading. If they can steal the election (we know they are trying -- see the district attorney press conference in PA), they'll point to the polls saying "Kamala was always ahead; the polls show it."
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Oct 29, 2024 15:33:13 GMT -6
That won't stop the Dems from trying. Yesterday a Nevada judge said that ballots w/o post marks can be accepted up to three days after the election. The Democrat printing presses are likely already working as I type this. This needs to be appealed to the SC immediately. IIRC, it's a State Court ruling. They first have to go through the process: State Appeals, State Supreme Court, and then SCOTUS. If the Dem judges drag it out, I assume they can appeal to the SCOTUS for a stay of the ruling, but that's a long shot.
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Oct 29, 2024 15:40:23 GMT -6
This needs to be appealed to the SC immediately. IIRC, it's a State Court ruling. They first have to go through the process: State Appeals, State Supreme Court, and then SCOTUS. If the Dem judges drag it out, I assume they can appeal to the SCOTUS for a stay of the ruling, but that's a long shot. NV SC rejected GOP appeal, so on to SC
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Oct 29, 2024 16:10:53 GMT -6
IIRC, it's a State Court ruling. They first have to go through the process: State Appeals, State Supreme Court, and then SCOTUS. If the Dem judges drag it out, I assume they can appeal to the SCOTUS for a stay of the ruling, but that's a long shot. NV SC rejected GOP appeal, so on to SC Thanks. Did the illegitimate Biden regime appeal the 5th circuit ruling that all ballots must be received by Election Day?
|
|