Popular Vote Numbers

There was a point where articles published through Yahoo News were less reliable than the comment section. I found myself clicking a link w/an interesting Subject, skipping the article, and going straight to those comment sections because the back-and-forth discussions provided a better assessment of the topic than the biased, or lazy author.

It didn’t necessarily need to even be about politics. I found it useful for sports moments or even additional details on something like crime.


Not long after the gentle giant got put down, the comment sections all went away. Suddenly, there was less information and worse yet, no check against the mass publication of the news room.

Storylines to fit a narrative ran rampant. Specific details got intentionally omitted. Cross examination was impossible and the silos REALLY got forged.

Before, people would post how “white” criminals, gunman, rapists, or even the potential crooked “white” policeman were being identified in articles; which is fine, but the same principles weren’t being applied when a black person was involved… you know, unless they were being shot by police. It got so bad, it became a running joke to anyone who regularly visited Yahoo to get latest news.

And the embarrassing attempts at hyping stories came with the dumbest buzzwords. So, if a woman (especially one “of color”) was central to the narrative, they were always CLAPPING BACK against the stuffy white guys. If it was a white conservative making a solid argument against some policy, they’d include irrelevant information to undercut their point, like voting record on a totally different policy.

The news rooms got so arrogant, they started dismissing people’s opinions and pushing their own. To them, everyone was an immigrant, so they characterized illegal immigration as racist, despite the legal immigrants of Hispanic backgrounds being the ones loudest in their concerns about the illegals.

Rather than look at who crime was actually impacting; which often times was the black communities. The Democratic Party claimed policing was racist and therefore punishments needed to less harsh and the police needed to be defunded. The people crying for more policing was the black community!

The Democratic Party could not see through the cloud of their own smug, and were paralyzed to react at the criticism, because those critical must be an -ist or -ism.

Finally, what about the hardships on the working class the Democratic Party believed they represented? Well, obviously you bail out their Student Loans. Oh, the typical working class person (especially a PoC) didn’t go through a 4-year degree program, and you just blew your wad saving a bunch of baristas w/liberal arts degrees w/tax payer money? Oops!

Completely and totally tone deaf

I know many Republicans will claim it proves voter fraud in 2020. I’m not saying that. But if any Democrat would truly analyze the numbers honestly, they should realize that maybe Harris lost because a lot of Democrats didn’t vote.

I know! Everyone talks about the “silent majority” of people who don’t want to say who they voted for, yet it seems that, in this election, the “silent majority” was a large group of people who did NOT actually vote for Harris.

Answer: Back to the graveyards from which they came.