|
|
Post by moody on Nov 23, 2024 5:01:48 GMT -6
|
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 327
|
Post by Nano on Nov 23, 2024 5:34:42 GMT -6
And when they find no evidence of a material issue and issue a report similar to that of the Cyber Ninjas -- we didn't find any evidence of material fraud, but there COULD have been -- will you accept the results and admit you're wrong? Of course you won't. |
|
|
|
Post by moody on Nov 23, 2024 5:37:00 GMT -6
And when they find no evidence of a material issue and issue a report similar to that of the Cyber Ninjas -- we didn't find any evidence of material fraud, but there COULD have been -- will you accept the results and admit you're wrong? Of course you won't. Lets have a real investigation and see what happens. Most intelligent people recognize what happened with the 81 million votes. You hang to the lie of the “safest election in history” as if it’s the Holy Bible. Talk about never admitting they were wrong! |
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 327
|
Post by Nano on Nov 23, 2024 6:07:39 GMT -6
And when they find no evidence of a material issue and issue a report similar to that of the Cyber Ninjas -- we didn't find any evidence of material fraud, but there COULD have been -- will you accept the results and admit you're wrong? Of course you won't. Lets have a real investigation and see what happens. Most intelligent people recognize what happened with the 81 million votes. You hang to the lie of the “safest election in history” as if it’s the Holy Bible. Talk about never admitting they were wrong! Your screen name should be Charlie Brown. There is zero doubt how this will play out and what your reaction will be. I cite the Cyber Ninja's partisan fiasco as precedent to both. |
|
|
|
Post by moody on Nov 23, 2024 6:24:43 GMT -6
Lets have a real investigation and see what happens. Most intelligent people recognize what happened with the 81 million votes. You hang to the lie of the “safest election in history” as if it’s the Holy Bible. Talk about never admitting they were wrong! Your screen name should be Charlie Brown. There is zero doubt how this will play out and what your reaction will be. I cite the Cyber Ninja's partisan fiasco as precedent to both. yep, keep repeating it to yourself, nano….”the 2020 election was the safest in history!” 81M completely legit votes! Remember when you wanted to “meet at a bar and punch me in the nose” for my views on the 2020 election steal? I mean that was a totally legit reaction, for a psychopath. |
|
Nano
Junior Member
Posts: 327
|
Post by Nano on Nov 23, 2024 6:32:00 GMT -6
Your screen name should be Charlie Brown. There is zero doubt how this will play out and what your reaction will be. I cite the Cyber Ninja's partisan fiasco as precedent to both. yep, keep repeating it to yourself, nano….”the 2020 election was the safest in history!” 81M completely legit votes! Remember when you wanted to “meet at a bar and punch me in the nose” for my views on the 2020 election steal? I mean that was a totally legit reaction, for a psychopath. Lmfao you are such weak sauce Mark my word. Save these posts somehow if you can. |
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Nov 23, 2024 6:44:10 GMT -6
Please don't take this the wrong way but WaPo? I'll wait until something better than WaPo reports on it and then I still won't trust it! IMO, this is nothing but fear-mongering and shit-disturbing, which is what the media does best |
|
|
|
Post by longtimereader on Nov 23, 2024 6:49:28 GMT -6
And when they find no evidence of a material issue and issue a report similar to that of the Cyber Ninjas -- we didn't find any evidence of material fraud, but there COULD have been -- will you accept the results and admit you're wrong? Of course you won't. Lets have a real investigation and see what happens. Most intelligent people recognize what happened with the 81 million votes. You hang to the lie of the “safest election in history” as if it’s the Holy Bible. Talk about never admitting they were wrong! gotta remember Nano is a never Trumper leftist ally so he has to cling to the "safest election in history" since the ends justify the means to get Trump out of office for people like Nano. |
|
|
|
Post by moody on Nov 23, 2024 7:07:14 GMT -6
Please don't take this the wrong way but WaPo? I'll wait until something better than WaPo reports on it and then I still won't trust it! IMO, this is nothing but fear-mongering and shit-disturbing, which is what the media does best You might be right. It could be a false story. But, I think a real investigation of the 2020 election is still important. What happened that year was a travesty. I think the evidence shows the fraud and the attempted fraud was massive this cycle as well. But, the Republicans were ready for it this time. But, had the real election margin been closer, they could have stolen this one again. “Too big to rig” might not be big enough next time. |
|
|
|
Post by moody on Nov 23, 2024 7:08:08 GMT -6
Lets have a real investigation and see what happens. Most intelligent people recognize what happened with the 81 million votes. You hang to the lie of the “safest election in history” as if it’s the Holy Bible. Talk about never admitting they were wrong! gotta remember Nano is a never Trumper leftist ally so he has to cling to the "safest election in history" since the ends justify the means to get Trump out of office for people like Nano. Oh, trust me. I remember! He is also “former DOJ”, he says. |
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Nov 23, 2024 7:08:51 GMT -6
Please don't take this the wrong way but WaPo? I'll wait until something better than WaPo reports on it and then I still won't trust it! IMO, this is nothing but fear-mongering and shit-disturbing, which is what the media does best Thank You!!! We're back to the the LSM just creating stories based on leaks again. Read accordingly. |
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Nov 23, 2024 7:24:50 GMT -6
Please don't take this the wrong way but WaPo? I'll wait until something better than WaPo reports on it and then I still won't trust it! IMO, this is nothing but fear-mongering and shit-disturbing, which is what the media does best You might be right. It could be a false story. But, I think a real investigation of the 2020 election is still important. What happened that year was a travesty. I think the evidence shows the fraud and the attempted fraud was massive this cycle as well. But, the Republicans were ready for it this time. But, had the real election margin been closer, they could have stolen this one again. “Too big to rig” might not be big enough next time. I'm not sure if I agree on investigating the 2020 election or not. Seems to me the time to "investigate" is long past but that's JMHO. Now if they want to investigate the states that passed new voting laws and regulations 2, 3, 4, 5 months before the election, have at it! |
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Nov 23, 2024 7:26:12 GMT -6
Please don't take this the wrong way but WaPo? I'll wait until something better than WaPo reports on it and then I still won't trust it! IMO, this is nothing but fear-mongering and shit-disturbing, which is what the media does best Thank You!!! We're back to the the LSM just creating stories based on leaks again. Read accordingly. You're very welcome! I wasn't aware they ever stopped creating stories based on leaks and "anonymous tips"  |
|
