|
|
Post by captbudman on Jun 15, 2024 8:41:46 GMT -6
The Alphabet Mafia has claimed another scalp in their efforts to force their agenda on America. Sadly, the victim has been pressured to grovel and apologize, but is still unemployed....
“Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing.” ― George Orwell, 1984
|
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Jun 15, 2024 8:47:08 GMT -6
The Alphabet Mafia has claimed another scalp in their efforts to force their agenda on America. Sadly, the victim has been pressured to grovel and apologize, but is still unemployed.... “Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing.” ― George Orwell, 1984 Youngstown - of course she was fired! I'm amazed she wasn't run out of town on a rail! Imagine the horror of having your own opinion! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2024 9:02:21 GMT -6
Public figures publicly spouting bigotry run the risk of censure.
What does 'straight pride' mean, other than side eye at gays. It is a hostile stance. Its a free country. Also for employers, especially those with high visibility in the public.
All this focus on gay issues, etc., is tiring to me. But those wading in risk return fire. You have the right to offend, and the right for the offended, or those with a constituency among the offended (everyone, basically, lacking a hard-on against gay rights), to knock you off your perch.
|
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Jun 15, 2024 9:16:58 GMT -6
Public figures publicly spouting bigotry run the risk of censure. What does 'straight pride' mean, other than side eye at gays. It is a hostile stance. Its a free country. Also for employers, especially those with high visibility in the public. All this focus on gay issues, etc., is tiring to me. But those wading in risk return fire. You have the right to offend, and the right for the offended, or those with a constituency among the offended (everyone, basically, lacking a hard-on against gay rights), to knock you off your perch. Public figures? She's not an elected official. What business is it of any company of what you say when not at work (as long as you aren't defaming your employer). |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2024 9:31:05 GMT -6
Yes, the community relations director for WFMJ TV, is a public figure. Do I have to explain every goddamn thing to you ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Billy John Davy on Jun 15, 2024 9:54:46 GMT -6
What does 'gay pride' mean, other than side eye at straights. It is a hostile stance. Its a free country. Also for employers, especially those with high visibility in the public.
|
|
|
|
Post by arrass on Jun 15, 2024 9:56:43 GMT -6
Pinkard had reportedly shared the post about “straight pride” on her personal Facebook page while using a photo of the news station as her profile picture.
|
|
|
|
Post by bedfordforrest on Jun 15, 2024 10:10:43 GMT -6
She committed heresy against our national religion. Of course she was going to be fired.
|
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Jun 15, 2024 10:16:01 GMT -6
Pinkard had reportedly shared the post about “straight pride” on her personal Facebook page while using a photo of the news station as her profile picture. What's wrong with stating she's proud that of heteroseuxals on her own private Facebook page? As far as the complaint of "using a photo of the news station as her profile picture," why didn't the news station tell her not to use the same profile picture on her private Fakebook page for other posts? As BCM noted, the reason she was fired was speaking hearsay against the Government's official religion... |
|
wb
New Member
Posts: 76
|
Post by wb on Jun 15, 2024 11:50:29 GMT -6
Pinkard had reportedly shared the post about “straight pride” on her personal Facebook page while using a photo of the news station as her profile picture. What's wrong with stating she's proud that of heteroseuxals on her own private Facebook page? As far as the complaint of "using a photo of the news station as her profile picture," why didn't the news station tell her not to use the same profile picture on her private Fakebook page for other posts? As BCM noted, the reason she was fired was speaking hearsay against the Government's official religion... In a right and just world, there would be nothing wrong with posting something like that, but unfortunately we don't live in that kind of world. We've allowed the thought police to set the rules on what can and can't be posted and it has basically turned public discourse upside down. That said, I would think that this person would know better than to post that. This environment has been in place for quite some time now and anyone in the public eye that wants to remain employed, or employable, has to tow the line. It's a sad state of affairs but it's the reality we're in now. |
|
|
|
Post by froggy1 on Jun 15, 2024 11:52:58 GMT -6
She committed heresy against our national religion. Of course she was going to be fired. Yeah you can't celebrate being straight, it pisses off the commies. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2024 11:55:23 GMT -6
What's wrong with stating she's proud that of heteroseuxals on her own private Facebook page? As far as the complaint of "using a photo of the news station as her profile picture," why didn't the news station tell her not to use the same profile picture on her private Fakebook page for other posts? As BCM noted, the reason she was fired was speaking hearsay against the Government's official religion... In a right and just world, there would be nothing wrong with posting something like that, but unfortunately we don't live in that kind of world. We've allowed the thought police to set the rules on what can and can't be posted and it has basically turned public discourse upside down. That said, I would think that this person would know better than to post that. This environment has been in place for quite some time now and anyone in the public eye that wants to remain employed, or employable, has to tow the line. It's a sad state of affairs but it's the reality we're in now. Do you think its regrettable that publicly disrespecting gay rights (we could dispute, i suppose, on whether advocating 'straight pride', constitutes that disrespect) elicits negative social consequences ? Would it be a 'better' word if you could say any hateful thing you like and everyone would feel or be constrained, somehow, to put up with you ? |
|
wb
New Member
Posts: 76
|
Post by wb on Jun 15, 2024 12:09:53 GMT -6
In a right and just world, there would be nothing wrong with posting something like that, but unfortunately we don't live in that kind of world. We've allowed the thought police to set the rules on what can and can't be posted and it has basically turned public discourse upside down. That said, I would think that this person would know better than to post that. This environment has been in place for quite some time now and anyone in the public eye that wants to remain employed, or employable, has to tow the line. It's a sad state of affairs but it's the reality we're in now. Do you think its regrettable that publicly disrespecting gay rights (we could dispute, i suppose, on whether advocating 'straight pride', constitutes that disrespect) elicits negative social consequences ? Would it be a 'better' word if you could say any hateful thing you like and everyone would feel or be constrained, somehow, to put up with you ? You seem to be advocating that being publicly for "straight pride" somehow is disparaging to gays. If indeed that is your stance, than we'll probably never agree on the topic at hand. So to answer your question, no, I do not think it's ok to publicly disrespect gays. But posting a straight pride post is not disrespecting gays. There is literally no reason to find offense in that statement, those who do are the ones who are actually being hateful, closed minded, disrespectful, and all of the other words being used. The fact that this is the new norm should be sad to rational, reasonable people. |
|
|
|
Post by captbudman on Jun 15, 2024 12:42:16 GMT -6
In a right and just world, there would be nothing wrong with posting something like that, but unfortunately we don't live in that kind of world. We've allowed the thought police to set the rules on what can and can't be posted and it has basically turned public discourse upside down. That said, I would think that this person would know better than to post that. This environment has been in place for quite some time now and anyone in the public eye that wants to remain employed, or employable, has to tow the line. It's a sad state of affairs but it's the reality we're in now. Do you think its regrettable that publicly disrespecting gay rights (we could dispute, i suppose, on whether advocating 'straight pride', constitutes that disrespect) elicits negative social consequences ? Would it be a 'better' word if you could say any hateful thing you like and everyone would feel or be constrained, somehow, to put up with you ? I think the use comes down to, as you noted, in how "advocating" or celebrating being heterosexual, with it's thousands of years of positive benefits, is being "disrespectful." One could easily argue that promoting homosexuality and the rest of the Alphabet Mafia's agenda is also being disrespectful to heterosexuals as well as many religious people (including Jews, Christians, and Muslims). |
|
|
|
Post by stargatebabe on Jun 15, 2024 13:20:51 GMT -6
Do you think its regrettable that publicly disrespecting gay rights (we could dispute, i suppose, on whether advocating 'straight pride', constitutes that disrespect) elicits negative social consequences ? Would it be a 'better' word if you could say any hateful thing you like and everyone would feel or be constrained, somehow, to put up with you ? You seem to be advocating that being publicly for "straight pride" somehow is disparaging to gays. If indeed that is your stance, than we'll probably never agree on the topic at hand. So to answer your question, no, I do not think it's ok to publicly disrespect gays. But posting a straight pride post is not disrespecting gays. T here is literally no reason to find offense in that statement, those who do are the ones who are actually being hateful, closed minded, disrespectful, and all of the other words being used. The fact that this is the new norm should be sad to rational, reasonable people. I agree but you do have people out there who are just looking to be offended over the tiniest thing. This radio station is a great example and Stable makes 2 |
|
